HuskerNLimbo Posted February 8, 2011 Author Share Posted February 8, 2011 Nebraska = 24 LINK How did you get the footage from my work? : Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 Lol... FSU @ 3... uh, no. Also, I think we'll be fine on D. we have 3 returning starters in the secondary, and look for David, compton, and Fisher at LB. At D-line, we've got Meredith, Crick, and Steinkuhler returning. Technically, we're only replacing 2 starters as we'll see a lot more 4-3 than Peso. Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 24 seems about right to me. With alot of talent coming back on the defensive side of the ball, and a returning QB who has a full year of experience. Now the the game against Washington will tell us alot about this team. Quote Link to comment
husker_hurdler Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 I would have guessed 20-25 range.... Quote Link to comment
kchusker_chris Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 can't see us sitting behind Missouri, Arizona State, Notre Dame, Michigan State, etc. Quote Link to comment
74Hunter Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 We win Legends and the Big 10 CCG, we're in the BCS and likely we're in the MNC game. Wow it sounds even more ridiculous when used in a sentence. They really have to change those division names. Agree. I saw a Big 10 commercial with those names in it, and all I could think about was why not just name the divisions "Douches" and "Tools." Doesn't sound much worse. Quote Link to comment
DTrain2020 Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 I would rather be lower to start the season, than the 7-10 range(by most "experts') to start the season. You can really only go up in the rankings if you start the season in the 20's or not ranked. With no monkey on our backs, we shouldnt feel the pressure like we did in the Texas game this year. Journalists that write these articles also look at schedules. The only reason we were ranked so high at the start of last season was because of our cream puff schedule. Our schedule is going to be ranked in the top 15, so experts know there is a high risk involved to put us any higher. There are some teams that i can only laugh about, such as ASU and Michigan State. The refs should have called the game off early in the bowl game against Alabama, spartans were laying all over the field that day, and they are ranked 16th, very laughable. Quote Link to comment
BornRedCornFed Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 pre-season. doesnt matter all that much. good way to pass the 8 months or so i guess... Quote Link to comment
Hujan Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 We win Legends and the Big 10 CCG, we're in the BCS and likely we're in the MNC game. Wow it sounds even more ridiculous when used in a sentence. They really have to change those division names. And the logo. Everything about the conference design was a B1G failure. Just be glad we're not in Leaders: "All we have to do is lead, er, Leaders and win the Big 10 CCG . . . " For crying out loud, put Wisconsin and Illinois in our division, Michigan and Michigan State in the other, call 'em East and West, go back to the old logo, and all will be right in the world. This is an example of when trying to be too cute comes back to bite you in the ***. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 Pre-season rankings serve one purpose - to tell everybody 'this is how good we think you are'. Key word: think. They mean literally nothing. A lot of people say rankings don't matter till midseason, but for the most part, I don't think they matter all. Unfortunately, with so many teams and such a wacky system, you have to have rankings. No rankings in the NFL works because of the divisions and the low number of teams. I kind of wish the system in college was similar, at times. Quote Link to comment
Roark Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 We win Legends and the Big 10 CCG, we're in the BCS and likely we're in the MNC game. Wow it sounds even more ridiculous when used in a sentence. They really have to change those division names. Are "Atlantic" and "Coastal" already taken? ...Well poop. There goes my idea. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.