The NCAA has had ENOUGH of your shenanigans

[knapplc]

Looks like the NCAA has had enough. Schools like USC won't be getting a mild slap on the wrist anymore. I shudder to think what would happen to Miami if this would have been in effect when the Shapiro scandal broke.

 

Stiff NCAA penalties on the way with new model

 

Scandals, scholarships and rules changes were among the topics of frequent conversation at last week's NCAA Convention and while not everything president Mark Emmert wanted - the $2,000 cost of attendance stipend for example - was passed by the Legislative Council and Board of Directors, it's safe to say what happened in Indianapolis laid the ground work for significant changes that will impact schools for decades to come.

 

While details on most proposals from Presidential Working Groups finally emerged in some areas, the one place where there was plenty of talk but little substance was the new enforcement model that some in the organization have been tasked with reforming. After a year that included news about major infractions at Tennessee, Miami, Ohio State, North Carolina and others, it's no surprise that this would be one area of emphasis.

 

"We were damn mad and not going to take it anymore," Ed Ray, Oregon State president and chair of the Enforcement Working Group, said.

 

The Enforcement Working Group that came out of August's presidential retreat was tasked with creating a tiered violation structure, new penalty procedures, a reformed process for adjudication and a reformed process that is fair while supporting the collegiate model the organization is looking to uphold.

 

"In terms of what is our charge, we heard President Emmert talk about this risk-reward analysis and the fact that there seems to be a general loss of integrity and upholding the rules," Vice President for Enforcement Julie Roe Lach said. "This isn't purely a reactive move, we're not just doing this because of the scandals or if there is a crisis. We're doing this because it's the right thing to do. This is a time to redefine what are our principles and what do we stand for."

 

USC is the example provided. The Trojans would have been hammered if these rules had been in effect.

 

[ShawnWatson]

Yeah but USC's shenanigans are cheeky and fun, Penn State's are cruel and tragic.

[HuskerCarter]

Yeah but USC's shenanigans are cheeky and fun, Penn State's are cruel and tragic.

 

+1 good sir

[MLB 51]

So now they decide it's time to stiffen the rule's. They should have stepped up a long time ago.

[Animal_Mother]

I see that the new penalties attached to the breaking/violating of rules are far more costly, but what have they done to address the triggers that gets the NCAA involved and ultimately on the path to making decisions about violations? Further, what about the persons/committees in place to execute these rules and the subsequent violations? I don't know the intimate details of the NCAA's system, but based on fairly recent history and the nature of these penalties...it would seem that this could become a case of (1) no enforcement due to the severe nature of the penalties; (2) selective enforcement...which barring an aggregious violation could be construed as sniping; or (3) an even application of the new rules...the unknown being what happens at the tip of the spear.

 

As far as the OP thought on Miami.....yes this system would have come close to keelhauling that program if applied to their little scandal. Seems like this is a "shot across the bow" moment for football.