JJ Husker Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 I'm not that we'll versed in how these things work, so Thanks for the explanation dudeguyy. However, after reading their hypothesis and the general tone and language of the rest of their explanation, I was pretty well convinced this thing wouldn't have seen the light of day had it not supported their preconceived notions and that it would be extremely simple to make a claim against any group and get a result you could claim supported your hypothesis. Basically their study was just more of the same not really profound BS they were supposedly being objective about. Makes me wonder if they hadn't attempted this 5 times prior without the result they desired but the 6th time was a charm. Link to comment
TGHusker Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 This is a very profound thread. That is BS Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 This is a very profound thread. That is BS You must be a Hillary supporting liberal. I'll do a study, if it confirms it I'll publish. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts