NUpolo8

Come on Polo, you're better than that. Let's not pretend like he raped or molested someone. Would you feel the same way if one of the volleyball players flashed a gas station clerk? Holy freaking crap.

I think you'll find boot camp has probably changed a lot since you went through it. Not saying it's right, I'm just sayin.

Someone needs to go ask Dana Altman what happens when you let a dirtbag with a questionable history of sexual misconduct back on your team and it happens again. I honestly can't believe there are words that are banned here yet defending this is somehow ok.

Ya, b/c they are so close to being the same thing. Your lines are pretty wide i guess. Im guessing you dont spend much time outside your house, work, or away from a keyboard. You're wrong about a lot of things, it doesn't surprise me you're wrong in your assessment of me.

I didn't want a coach that "made a statement" or a "splash hire". I think there a lot of us that just wanted a HC hire that "made sense". It makes me wonder how many people had to google "MIke Riley"... So, the average fan has to kow who they are for it to make sense? Hardly. So hiring Mike Riley made sense to you, even though you didn't know who he was? I knew who he was.

eichorst needs to support riley like the medically-required, industrial strength bra my wife wears. I don't think Eichorst needs to be that strained in his efforts.

Everyone here complains about having to compete with Ohio St. Imagine if every recruit had to take a plane a stones throw from the Ohio st campus to come to a trip to NU Then you have a small idea of what Riley was up against.

You're supposed to like it and be against it.

I think the combine and his weight there will matter a lot.

I like how this board, and many of the ones here defending Avery and blaming the University, wastes no time taking great pleasure in taking the moral high road against schools like say, Florida st. More than winning indeed.

And Bo kept Watson. I'm cool with Riley making his own hires.

I don't tee off for another hour.

Oh, the irony. Probably no more ironic than saying someone has an obsession with Bo then proceeds to defend a criminal with ties to the old staff at the expense of the University he supports. Rain on a wedding day and all that.

Thank you for beating me to this point.Your point was to accuse him of a crime he clearly didn't commit. This isn't an ambiguity between two laws, it is a pretty clear interpretation. That didn't stop you from throwing claims that he committed "sexual assault" without even knowing what the hell it meant. At least this isn't a deflection. It's an assault in a great many states. And I'm pretty stunned you'd want him back, after two transgressions. Maybe Youngstown st will take him. Which states? Your infatuation with Bo Pelini and YSU is troubling. Expert, is stalking considered sexual assault in a great many states? Yeah, I think this proves this is over. Moss is gone, and I'm moving on. You are free to attempt to downgrade what he did with semantics and deflection all you like.

Thank you for beating me to this point. Your point was to accuse him of a crime he clearly didn't commit. This isn't an ambiguity between two laws, it is a pretty clear interpretation. That didn't stop you from throwing claims that he committed "sexual assault" without even knowing what the hell it meant. At least this isn't a deflection. It's an assault in a great many states. And I'm pretty stunned you'd want him back, after two transgressions. Maybe Youngstown st will take him.

He didn't commit sexual assault. Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives! I still don't want him back. He didn't need to plead it down. None of his actions were first, second, or third degree sexual assault in Nebraska. It is not semantics, it is the law. You are are improperly applying it and accusing a former Husker player of a crime he didn't commit. a lot of the law is a matter of semantics. what do you think is being argued in so many appellate cases? Thank you for beating me to this point.

He didn't commit sexual assault. Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives! I still don't want him back.

That is quite a disparaging comment about the team and players you supposedly like. More of a commentary on their development. I think that they all had potentially great careers in front of them, they we're let down by their coach

Who is them you speak of? I wasn't privy to these conversations like you. But you are privy to the inner workings of this grand scheme by some shadowy folk at NU to waste a year of Moss's life, as you put it. Interesting. He's gone. It's probably for the best. All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays. I'm chalking this up to an "oh well"

Lol that OL

It sounds like he got tremendously bad advice, I'd take it up with them before you start disparaging an institution you're supposedly like.

What proof of this do you have? I ask because this sounds like Osborne was forced out and Osborne himself has gone on record to say he wasn't forced out. osborne went on record saying the only possible thing he could say in that sitatuation. pelini was on record saying something different. not saying either is true, but i don't think pelini would just make that crap up, and i wouldn't expect osborne to every confirm it as fact. Some people here have trouble reading between the lines. Osborne was probably brought in to "right the ship" after the Steve Peterson experiment ran off the rails probably less so then he was brought in to save Perlman's ass from all the pitchfork wielding fans and boosters for making that hire, giving everyone contract extensions, etc. Then once things calmed down and Perlman decided Bo had to go in comes another puppet that was hired without consulting or any involvment by the current interim AD, who is a living legend in that place, and he gets phased out so HP could push his agenda without someone above football who could actually push back at all. So no, the Chancellor shouldn't be judged on Athlectics usually excepting that he keeps sticking his nose in them. That's why if Coach Riley ends up with a similar record here to his long history of mediocrity in Corvalis Perlman will need to get canned along with the rests of the staff and AD. Nobody is rooting for that, but that'll be the reality of the situation if the program needs saving again. Otherwise we'll just keep letting Perlman repeat the same cycle that's already kept the program down for over a decade now. Osborne was "probably brought in to right the ship"? Really? That's exactly why he was brought back in as interim AD after Pedersen was fired. Again, I'll ask why Osborne needs to be consulted for every decision concerning the football team? And exactly what is this agenda Perlman is pushing? Perhaps because he was in the job that was being filled and has a long history in athletics and had basically been running that part of the job in football since before devany left, because he built the thing to what it was when it was at it's best, or because he calmed the boosters that would've taken HP down too by coming back. Not saying he should have had final say, but you know getting his opinion of candidates during the process wouldn't have been a bad thing, even if it was ignored at least it would be respectful. What proof of this do you have? I ask because this sounds like Osborne was forced out and Osborne himself has gone on record to say he wasn't forced out. osborne went on record saying the only possible thing he could say in that sitatuation. pelini was on record saying something different. not saying either is true, but i don't think pelini would just make that crap up, and i wouldn't expect osborne to every confirm it as fact. Some people here have trouble reading between the lines. Osborne was probably brought in to "right the ship" after the Steve Peterson experiment ran off the rails probably less so then he was brought in to save Perlman's ass from all the pitchfork wielding fans and boosters for making that hire, giving everyone contract extensions, etc. Then once things calmed down and Perlman decided Bo had to go in comes another puppet that was hired without consulting or any involvment by the current interim AD, who is a living legend in that place, and he gets phased out so HP could push his agenda without someone above football who could actually push back at all. So no, the Chancellor shouldn't be judged on Athlectics usually excepting that he keeps sticking his nose in them. That's why if Coach Riley ends up with a similar record here to his long history of mediocrity in Corvalis Perlman will need to get canned along with the rests of the staff and AD. Nobody is rooting for that, but that'll be the reality of the situation if the program needs saving again. Otherwise we'll just keep letting Perlman repeat the same cycle that's already kept the program down for over a decade now. It's ironic that your user name is methodical when your logic is anything but. What agenda are you talking about? If you're going to make accusations you need to articulate Pearlman's vision. Since you can't, maybe you should just stop posting or get over your feelings being hurt. The words in bold seem like exactly what you're rooting for. The adhominem attacks for anyone that doesn't go along with the groupthink on this site is why the posters with good info have left this site years ago. Mine's second hand because I've been around long enough to know who to listen to. And we're all Nebraska fans here, nobody is rooting for the team to take a step back. Some of us are just pointing out that should it become necessary to rid ourselves of another Peterson/Callahan level f-up, the problems will have started from the top down and that's where the cutting will need to start. Who were the posters with good info who left? ADS and PaulCrewe both used to post all the time. Now, not much. da skers along with a few others. I haven't noticed a drop off in super secret insider posts.Plus I'm never much for "cool" posters holding the board hostage because they have a bee in their bonnet about some unimportant thing in an internet board. Im not talking about people with super secret inside info. Im talking about good, well respected posters that make the board better when the post. Especially ADS in the recruiting forum (yeah, I know you think anyone who goes in there is stupid, but you gotta get through the offseason somehow). And I don't think its any secret that they don't post as much because of all the crap that went on during the season. Every thread turning into a bitchfest between boliever and boleaver... Well that's over, they could pull the string out and post again. And you said it all about the recruiting section.