in regards to this, I do. I see 11 wins as a real possibility. Ive stated as such. And also, that a 10-2 regular season should be a realistic expectation. 9 wins is obviously acceptable depending on the circumstances. Anything less? I'll admit failure. This aint no culture shock rebuild like it was in 2004. There's a lot to build on here. Influx some sound coaching, improve the mentality (which is probably the most daunting task by far) and this team can flourish.
But also like Knapp says, even if this guy does just win 9-10 games every year, fails to win a conference title, but does it in a far more respectful manner in regards to national perception and his handling of the program within the walls of North Stadium, and doesnt do much if anything at all to embarrass us, and we look like at least a halfway competent football team on the big stage then yeah, I'll accept that as a huge improvement as well.
I'm not going to settle for that. I really hope Nebraska can win the conference title within the next two seasons, our schedule makes it nearly impossible for two seasons after that.
If it doesn't happen, it'll be two decades since we've won a game with meaning. For the record, I'm not a big fan of the Riley hire or his staff hires for the most part. I'm not 'butthurt'. They waited a year too long to fire Bo if you ask me.
I'll agree. We shouldnt settle for that. But what I'm saying is that result shouldnt be deemed as a failure or a step back. We should always be striving to be the best program possible. I just dont agree with the mood that this guy HAS to come in and improve on 9/10 wins to not be an immediate failure, even though I do believe it's a realist possibility that he does.
Point taken. But there is a different dynamic at work, he's not coming into a situation in which the team is coming off a losing season. He doesn't get a pass if we have a 7-5 year or something, but I do understand what you're saying.
Anything less than 9 wins isnt good at all in my opinion. Not with the schedule we have. I will be extrememly dissappointed in less than 9 regular season wins. I just dont know where on the schedule 4 losses come from even playing mediocre football every week. Wisconsins got new coaches again and theyre at home, and Michigan St has a new DC. That's a pretty big shakeup on their bellcow phase of the game, even if Dantonio is the ultimate defensive mind there. I'm still meh on the challenges that BYU and Miami will provide. Miami lost Duke. I just dont know. With our schedule, anything less than 9 regular season wins is going to leave me and probably all of Husker nation scratching their heads and wanting to beat down Eichorst's door. I just dont see it happening though.
I still think that in year one 9 wins is a very real possibility but so is 7-5. If we do lose 5 games it will depend on how we lose those games. If they are epic meltdown loses that mimic the Pelini era then the is a rather large cause for concern. But if those loses are competitive then I think that in year 2 we will see some hardware. Year one for any coach is difficult, but he is bringing a ton of experience on this staff and Riley is open to adjusting his scheme around the talent we have. I expect the offense to improve big time. It is all going to depend on how well the defense plays next season, if the D can play well in the big games then we should have an excellent season.