Jump to content


Red Five

Members
  • Posts

    9,525
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by Red Five

  1. Video http://www.49ers.com/video/videos/Coach-Em-Up-Reggie-Davis/bdc2cf2f-f64a-4a68-b8a3-18d53a8a8451
  2. He was rumored to be following Harbaugh to Michigan.
  3. I think we can all agree on the above!
  4. It's not that we had a chance, many wanted the new HC hiring to be a "WOW", not a "meh"... This. A hire that had people talking about the bold move or move towards getting NU back. Not a quick check of Wikipedia, not hearing how nice he is etc.... When Callahan was hired, I was livid, because I knew, after seeing what he'd done to my Raiders, he'd hurt the program. Bo was hired, almost everyone was excited because he'd been here before, and he wasn't Clownahan. Now they hire Riley, who most of us, when he was hired almost immediately said, "who?"... This almost seems like a hire that was based on the fact that they didn't know who else they could get, so they got Riley. And if this guy falls flat on his ass, which I hope he doesn't, everyone can say "at least he was nicer than Bo"... That's what I wonder. How did Reilly even get on the radar. Was it another, sh!t, we fired a guy and my short list all said no? ADSE had him on a list from 2005 when he was at South Carolina and they were looking for a coach. Where do people get this crap that "everyone turned us down so we ended up with Riley"? He was SE's #1 target. Do you think SE could have named a coach in 4 days if he was being turned down left and right? http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/12009292/behind-scenes-quiet-search-brought-mike-riley-nebraska-cornhuskers I have no idea what you're arguing against. It was asked where ADSE came up with Riley. I responeded with exactly what you quoted. So I guess we agree. Sorry. Probably shouldn't have quoted your post as my response wasn't meant for you.
  5. I love that this is what recruiting has come to.
  6. Pretty sure we can call/text/tweet/facebook him now, the dead period just prohibits in person contact and limits phone calls IIRC.
  7. Anyways, all the "wow" hire discussion would have been moot if SE had fired Bo after the 2013 Iowa game. Then we would have got Chris Peterson and and everyone would have been happy (at least thats what my mind tells me).
  8. Many here wanted McElwain so I'd say he was higher on our collective list. Sark was a bigger name available. Pretty sure most here would have preferred Narduzzi so yes to him. Frost definitely but SE wasn't interested. We should have at least checked with Patterson. So hiring CSU's coach or MSU's DC would have been a wow because they were mentioned on HB? Did Sark ever win more than 8 games at UW? I think most would have considered Narduzzi a wow hire. Pretty much the biggest-name coordinator. He went to Pitt so surely he would have come here if we offered. McElwain isn't really a wow but was high on a lot of people's lists. Sark was 5-7 his first year followed by three 7-6 years and was 9-4 his last year. But, you know, he didn't have as many resources there. If we had hired Narduzzi people would be pissed off that we hired another coordinator who had never been a HC and would be "learning on the job". Picking nits, Sark was 8-4 his last year at UW. He didn't coach the bowl game...
  9. It's not that we had a chance, many wanted the new HC hiring to be a "WOW", not a "meh"... This. A hire that had people talking about the bold move or move towards getting NU back. Not a quick check of Wikipedia, not hearing how nice he is etc.... When Callahan was hired, I was livid, because I knew, after seeing what he'd done to my Raiders, he'd hurt the program. Bo was hired, almost everyone was excited because he'd been here before, and he wasn't Clownahan. Now they hire Riley, who most of us, when he was hired almost immediately said, "who?"... This almost seems like a hire that was based on the fact that they didn't know who else they could get, so they got Riley. And if this guy falls flat on his ass, which I hope he doesn't, everyone can say "at least he was nicer than Bo"... That's what I wonder. How did Reilly even get on the radar. Was it another, sh!t, we fired a guy and my short list all said no? ADSE had him on a list from 2005 when he was at South Carolina and they were looking for a coach. Where do people get this crap that "everyone turned us down so we ended up with Riley"? He was SE's #1 target. Do you think SE could have named a coach in 4 days if he was being turned down left and right? http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/12009292/behind-scenes-quiet-search-brought-mike-riley-nebraska-cornhuskers
  10. Many here wanted McElwain so I'd say he was higher on our collective list. Sark was a bigger name available. Pretty sure most here would have preferred Narduzzi so yes to him. Frost definitely but SE wasn't interested. We should have at least checked with Patterson. So hiring CSU's coach or MSU's DC would have been a wow because they were mentioned on HB? Did Sark ever win more than 8 games at UW? But some of us are wrong for feeling apathetic about the newly frocked HC who's best is 10 wins and a victory in the Sun Bowl??? You have every right to feel apathetic. Hell, this program has turned many apathetic over the past 15 years. I just don't understand the whole "wow" hire thing. I want the "right" hire, not the "wow" hire. Is Riley that guy? I don't know, but time will tell.
  11. Harry Phillips just recorded a TFL. Just sayin...
  12. Many here wanted McElwain so I'd say he was higher on our collective list. Sark was a bigger name available. Pretty sure most here would have preferred Narduzzi so yes to him. Frost definitely but SE wasn't interested. We should have at least checked with Patterson. So hiring CSU's coach or MSU's DC would have been a wow because they were mentioned on HB? Did Sark ever win more than 8 games at UW?
  13. What would qualify as a "wow" hire? Patterson? Mullen? Richt? Frost? Bielema? Narduzzi? Did Florida get a "wow" hire in McElwain? What about USC with Sark last year?
  14. Do people actually think that NU had a chance to get Harbaugh? And if the 9ers win a couple more games this year (they lost to the Bears and Raiders!) they are in the playoffs and Harbaugh isn't in Ann Arbor.
  15. Full article -> It’s time for Bob Stoops to go its especially funny because he specifically said that it wasn't like that at LSU and Oklahoma. Someone gets what this thread was about.
  16. S&C - Philipp He doesn't count as 1 of 9 assistants. Correct. But he is just as important (if not more).
  17. Was this a "serious" inquiry or sarcastic? Just asking…. According to a majority of HB, Nebraska is still a 'Top Notch' job. This has been up for discussion for years. Only the people 'inside" the State or strong ties or love for the program are convinced that Nebraska is an upper echelon destination. The rest of the country , including almost every national media outlet, says Nebraska has dropped and was a distant 3rd when they compared Florida, Michigan, and Nebraska as coaching destinations. So, if you are being serious ( you think that there is a long list ), then you must agree that MR is passing some great guys up……. if you are being sarcastic, then you obviously are admitting that this ISN'T your old Nebraska anymore. Not trying to start a riff, just honestly trying to get your stance… or opinion. It was a sarcastic reply to some posters (not saying its you) after every hire (except Bray) moaning about that coach being a buddy hire, not having a good history, not being Frost/Orgeron/etc. I just want to know what would make these people happy and who do they think they Riley should have hired. If you are going to bitch about it, then give a realistic solution. As far as Nebraska in the grand scheme of CFB, I would put it in the 10-20 range as far as a destination. Yes, there was a time when it would have been probably top 7ish, but not now. The landscape has changed too much over the past 20 years (scholarship limits including more local kids going to lower divisions, facility arms race, S&C being fairly level, speeding up of the recruiting calendar, etc). Why would a position coach from Georgia want to make a lateral move the Nebraska? He is coaching in the best conference in the country and has much more talent closely available for recruiting. As far as my stance, I am happy with Riley and who he has brought in both coaching and support staff wise. Now he has to prove on the field over the next few years that he can get Nebraska back to where we all want it to be.
  18. I would like to see some people submit a list of "proven and impressive" assistant coaches that Riley could have hired that would be willing to come to Nebraska.
  19. This isn't Ed Orgeron. Fire Riley!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  20. Jerseys in the backround are Cincinnati ones, so someone on here: http://www.gobearcats.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/cinn-m-footbl-mtt.html#coaches
  21. ... doesn't cover Oklahoma football, or they would be calling for Bob Stoop's head. I mean according to Bo, the media is only out to get you here and no where else. Oh wait. Full article -> It’s time for Bob Stoops to go
  22. The bolded is what the rumblings were about yesterday. And Mav's repsonse leads creedance to this possibly not being the case.
×
×
  • Create New...