Vitalis Jackson

l still don't know if TA has bad eyes or a bad brain, but he doesn't get progressions and gets really, really confused on inside short routes.

It's almost reached the point in this game where TA goes down with an injury.

I think it goes all the way back to that short guy that Osborne named as his successor. Recruiting died and never returned, except for a sprinkling of JC transfers Callahan grabbed out of desperation.

He was a joke when we hired him Hey, Nebraska's a low wage state, and we got a low wage coach. Get used to it, I suppose.

I agree with the EXPN commentator, if NU comes back today it won't be with Armstrong. I wonder if Barney's wrist is worse than we've been told, it seems as though it's TA no matter how horrible it gets. I long for the day when we have a real QB that throws real passes.

I think he's already done that.

then when the camera pans to the sideline. Everybody has "is the game over yet" look. Reilly looks like he wants to do something but can't/won't. These are still mainly Pelini spawn, though. The options are limited.

Because these coaches don't operate on common sense. They are opposed to using common sense. In all truthiness, though, many of these players just aren't that good. Recruiting rankings say otherwise. These seniors haven't been recruited for years, so I don't think that's pertinent.

I love Tommy. He is the toughest man alive. He is a great zone-read QB. It's not his fault that he is being coached by morons. All he can do is go out and try to execute the game plan he is given. If he is not doing what the coaches want, then perhaps his offensive coordinator and QB coach (cough, cough Langs), could coach him to do the right thing. Or come up with a game plan that plays to his strengths. He can't run and he can't throw and, somehow, that's the coaches' fault? Flawed logic that. I don't like to call out players. They go in the game and do their best. So, let's just for a moment say you're correct. Let's say that Tommy can't throw and can't run. Then answer me this...why the hell is he in the game? If you can't see how this is the coaches fault, then it is you who lacks the ability to understand logic. This. I agree, except the supply of real quarterbacks at NU was curiously zilch after Pelini was fired. He apparently forgot to recruit any. At any rate, I'd certainly love to see Barney start the second half--Armstrong is incompetent, he's the worst best qb the NCAA has ever seen.

Because these coaches don't operate on common sense. They are opposed to using common sense. In all truthiness, though, many of these players just aren't that good.

It's sure gonna be great when these seniors graduate. Newby's remarkable, though; he's played in every game in his career, and gone to the sideline with an injury twice as many times.

considering we had 123 at halftime...Losing your starting quarterback can do that...Let's not act like the game was going much different with our starting qb. Agreed. Tommy's only TD pass this game went to Ohio State. I can't honestly say there was much drop-off when Barney Fife came in. Did Pellini forget to recruit QB's or something?

Next year maybe we'll have an actual quarterback, and perhaps even offensive linemen and running backs!

It's not "just" that it didn't work under Callahan. Tom Osborne directly "advised" Riley that it was important to be able to run the ball. Osborne "might" have some insight into the matter. And it doesn't help that the only three losing seasons in modern Husker football history have been recorded by Callahan and Riley. Osborne wasn't exactly stellar with selecting head coaches, though.

Why would he transfer from the one school that he has been a starter at? I can guarantee you that his existing skill set is not in high demand, and I don't think he could learn any other system enough in one year to become a starter elsewhere. Ludicrous idea, this. But whatever.

Squeaky wheels, you know. Internet America has become a shoddy world of squeaky wheels. I do feel that most Husker fans understand quite well what a train wreck Pelini left behind. We all probably know some of those odd Pelini fans that still inexplicably defend him. I think those people will continue to be the loudest, and I think that the haters will always outnumber everyone else on any message board about any given subject. So, no, I don't think opinions gathered from this message board are very meaningful relative to actual perceptions of this coaching staff in the real world.

Exactly this. It's unbelievable people are blaming Tommy for our loss yesterday or others during the season. This is squarely on a coaching staff that is asking a QB with tremendous running capabilities to pass the ball when everyone knows this is not his skill set. If Tommy was handing the ball off, running the option and occasionally a pass or two were added to the mix, we win vs. Iowa and probably a few more games as well this season. I think this is just plain wrong-headed. As a coach, I'm not going to let the players dictate my philosophy based upon what they aren't good at. I'm going to run my offense/defense and force the players to adapt. Players have to learn the system . . . not the other way around. Coaches don't play fantasy league football, BTW.

Solich and Pelini are gone and they are not coming back. Get over it, already.

Seriously? It's possible, I suppose, but it looks unlikely. 3 year starter beating out a true frosh. It does sound highly unlikely. The QB spot is unique and critical to an offense . . . look at the difference a QB change made for Iowa this year! Honestly, there have been some games this season that TA's shortcomings have created losses. One could easily argue that TA alone lost the game with Iowa . . . but, that's football sometimes. We'll see what the fall brings, I guess, but I'm fairly certain TA won't be the starting QB at the end of next season. You described the word 'plausible'. A true frosh replacing even a three year starter is plausible, under the right circumstances. However, I would warn anybody that it is very common for coaches to stay with experience, especially at the QB position. The most important thing is not to treat O'Brien unfairly because of one's opinion of Armstrong. From what I've read about some problems that TA has had with coaching relationships, though, it may be that experience might not be enough to ensure his job. He has to want to succeed, and he has to understand how other people are important for attaining that goal. He cannot simply blow off coaching--next year, these coaches will not be as forgiving of these players as they were in the first year. That's my story, and thanks for reading!

Good luck with the beer, though! LOL

Who keeps starting Armstrong, who never pulls him, who watches Armstrong throw off of his back foot all season and is okay with it, who calls passing plays for Armstrong when they (should, by now) know he's not capable of making good throws or good decisions? Here's a hint: They are all the same two people and neither one is 74husker. So if you have a quarterback who can't or won't improve and the coaches can't or won't bench him or develop him or the guy behind him, who's at fault? Cripes, I think I could have taken Jamal Turner and turned him into a better quarterback by now than what we have in Armstrong...and if I couldn't, I wouldn't make him the showpiece of the offense. Maybe you should stop with the name calling and insults and thinkjust a little deeper in your analysis Then you might come off a little better in your posts. I don't think you have much familiarity with team dynamics. Do you understand that TA is a team captain? The atmosphere left behind after the stench of Bo & company was absolutely poisonous. Players transferred, conspired, and bitched. The best ones graduated, and the remaining recruits from that prior coaching staff lacked good QB's, running backs, receivers, etc., etc. Bo's recruiting--in terms of on the field success--was hideous. Solich did it, then Callahan came in and tried to fix it. He was fired before he could even use a lot of his own recruits, but Pelini got to use them and benefited . . . until they were gone. That's where we are, now. Trust me, if there were any viable alternatives to using TA this season, it would have happened. As it was, staff had to just grit their teeth and deal with him. TA obviously has several issues to work out before he can be a successful QB. He has the physical traits, but the emotional and intellectual ones are the challenges. This is a quality coach, an intelligent coach, a classy coach, and so is his staff. Please allow them to succeed.

And it all started when we allowed an outgoing coach and a gang of boosters to select the heir apparent coach.

It's earned if a team goes 6-6, otherwise it's akin to being crowned Miss America because the other 49 contestants died when the stage collapsed...and it is the city fathers and chambers of commerce that love bowl games that bring in fans. THAT is why every city with a stadium that seats over 500 clamors to have a bowl game. But this is something you just made up. It isn't reality at all.

I'll say it again . . . if it would have been completed for a TD, it would be called a "genius" play call. This is part of football; get used to it. I don't think the majority would call it a genius call. Most would say a gutsy, but ill advised, very lucky call. You have a QB who is not good on touch passes, but a gifted runner, so you ask him to make one of the most difficult throws in football. When you need one frickin yard. Do you recall the scenario on 3rd down and 1, in just the previous play? What play did we run? Up the middle, for no gain. Why do you believe that the same play would have different results on an even more obvious 4th down? C'mon, people. This is called Monday morning quarterbacking.

Seriously? It's possible, I suppose, but it looks unlikely. 3 year starter beating out a true frosh. It does sound highly unlikely. The QB spot is unique and critical to an offense . . . look at the difference a QB change made for Iowa this year! Honestly, there have been some games this season that TA's shortcomings have created losses. One could easily argue that TA alone lost the game with Iowa . . . but, that's football sometimes. We'll see what the fall brings, I guess, but I'm fairly certain TA won't be the starting QB at the end of next season.