Nebfanatic

Was there people who weren't there and had no information to assume they were there throwing out claims they were there without evidence?

I'll take your word for it but I am basing my comments on what I saw from.you today and what I've seen from you in the past. I appreciate your change of heart, but there are also consequences for supporting a person like this up until the point you have. As someone else has said, this has been the person you have been supporting all along. I apologize for coming off harshly, but support for this behavior is infuriating to me. Deflections and whataboutisms trying to make this not as bad as it is is a big reason we are where we are. Its a tactic that is continually in use for Trump and his supporters. So when the first post I see from you considering your history on the board I see the same tactics in play. Now I understand this isn't your intention, but given your positions in the past and what was posted that is what I saw. And I wasn't the only one. You may have to acknowledge the fact that past opinions have an affect on how people see you now.

Which thread? Not this one, I checked. That post was your first on the issue in this thread. Thats what I have seen from you today.

If im not mistaken this is where your commentary starts. Sounds to me like you are blaming the media first and foremost. Very little blame for Trump. These are your own words, not sure how im supposed to take that or how im twisting it. Please correct me.

Lmao ok buddy. If that isn't implying that antifa is there doing the same thing then I don't know what is. This is what im talking about. You bring antifa up when realistically there is zero reason to and then when called out on it, im twisting your words. Classic victim complex.

You do it to yourself when you decide to make it about 'the media' and barely acknowledge the main cause of this issue is a seditious president. It took you this long to give Trump the credit he deserves in this situation. So I have no sympathy for you. I am not twisting your words, I'm pointing out what you choose to focus on says alot about you, which it does. You can deny that fact all you wish but I'm not the only one apparently twisting your words, so maybe I'm not the problem here.

The title of the thread is angry violent right so I believe this is a better thread for posts about the right inciting violence than starting a brand new one yes.

Provide some evidence antifa was there inciting violence instead of just throwing out baseless claims to 'both sides' this situation. We have actual proof right wingers incited violence at protests this summer, something I'm positive you don't have.

@Archy1221 Just one example of right wing extremist hijacking George Floyd protest. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/alleged-followers-of-boogaloo-movement-face-charges-linked-to-protests-11592920008 I have more if you want

I honestly can't believe you want to make this about that when its clearly about Trump and his rhetoric first and foremost. Again, if you think Chris Cuomos comments have contributed to this and thats what you want to focus on you are more than missing the forest for the trees and frankly I believe you are doing it on purpose despite the front you have put on recently.

Chris Cuomo saying protests aren't supposed to be peaceful isn't causing this. If you think it is, you give 'the media' way too much credit. Let's post pictures of destroyed businesses and then videos of bugaloo boys and counter protesters causing much of the destruction. If you wanna go there we can.

This is your go to. How bout an actual response. People aren't picking on you, maybe you're just wrong on this one.

Except when democrats are in office or tens of millions of people need help because of a global pandemic.

Yea that was a miss. I still like the guys we signed in this class but Breece has been amazing at ISU. He had good size and speed coming out of HS, I figured he would contribute early.

Ever heard of Murder Point oysters? They are absolutely delicious, but there is a story behind the name. I won't delve too deeply but the moral of the story is people will kill each other over just about anything, especially if money is involved.

Pretty sure the specific resolution in question doesn't involve anything other than an increase to the check. Its a stand alone resolution.

No telling what the motive is here but a terrible Christmas morning in Nashville

What a very convincing point. There was no election fraud, Donald Trump lost fair and square, and he is lying profusely about it as he does every other thing.

So its not lazy to assume he is spinning a web then?

Ok way to completely move the goalposts and not actually respond to anything I have said. You aren't questioning things in a realistic way, you are regurgitating propaganda created for the purpose of casting doubt on an election which was free, fair and reflects the will of the American people. There is absolutely no evidence that any of these election fraud claims are true so you can't possibly be questioning this in a realistic way. When these conspiracy theories are thrown out of court time and again you can no longer say that these claims have a basis in reality and you are just doing your due diligence to look into them. Thats complete BS and you and I and everyone else on this site knows it no matter how much you'd like to project otherwise.

How about you try reading. Or are you just going to continue blindly listen to the pathological liar who has been proven false on this and many other claims?

Someone already told you why. Are you going to believe the people who were actually there or a president who lies every time he opens his mouth? Why did you change the subject Redux? Can't make the field goal unless you move the goalposts huh? What's funny is you can't even make it then.

What does this have to do with the fact you gullibilly eat up everything a known pathological liar says without any doubt in your mind? And you think that makes everyone else lazy way to move the goalposts over to another state. I guess you don't want to talk about how much you trust a well documented liar anymore.

If a person lies to me 20,000 times I am going to doubt everything that comes out of their mouth until they can provide proof for what they are saying. You'd be a fool not to. Also, lying and making things up isn't a difference of opinion. The truth is not subject to opinion.

Its not lazy when it has been proven to be nothing but a web time and time again in the court of law. Court of law>pathological liar with everything to gain from lying. Thats not lazy its purely common sense.