I find it very, very, very hard to believe that the Athletic Director of the University of Nebraska "does not want what is best for the athletic program." Peters made some good points (although some of it seems like he is making pretty big assumptions about Riley and the administration given that he isn't with the team during game week, or in the locker room, or really anywhere actually), but Eichorst has nothing to gain from running a big ten school's athletic program in the ground.
I absolutely believe he isn't a great communicator, and he has definitely handled some things wrong, but come on dude. Baseball, volleyball, and gymnastics won big ten championships last year and 13 Nebraska sports teams went to the post season. Even though Riley hasn't performed to expectation at all, people inside the football community who know what they're talking about absolutely lauded him for that hire. Keyshawn sent his kid here, Les Miles sent his kid here, Kurt Warner sent his kid here. At the time college football coaches rated Riley as the second most underrated coach in the country behind Cutliffe. Herbstreit called it a great hire, Brock Huard said there's no one he'd rather his kid play for, Mack Brown said it was a great hire, PAC-12 assistants said they were happy to see him go because he was the best talent evaluator in the conference by far, yada yada yada yada.
It's been excruciatingly disappointing thus far and Eichorst hasn't handled it that well in my view, but to say the guy isn't interested in what is best for the athletic program is incredibly absurd. It didn't work out like everybody wanted and hoped it would, tough luck. Just because you fail doesn't mean you don't care