Advance to the 1:35 mark. The hit is in the lower right quad of the screen. Head hunting - clear as a bell. Cheap, dirty shot... and then laughing on the sideline. Thug play.
How is this cheap or dirty again?
Because of the rules:
"According to the National Collegiate Athletic Association's 2005 Football Rules and Interpretations: "No player shall use his helmet (including the face mask) to butt or ram an opponent or attempt to punish him. There shall be no spearing. No player shall strike a runner with the crown or the top of his helmet....""
I didn't ask how it was illegal... I understand why people believe that... although they are wrong.
I asked "How is this cheap or dirty?"
I would LOOOOOOVE to hear your answer.
MOST people agree that not playing within the rules constitutes "dirty" play, i.e. cheating.
Some classic "troll" like responses. First, you define the hit as "head hunting" ... although no head was hit. You state it's "clear as a bell" ... when in reality it's very clear that Eric's shoulder hits the chest muscle flush with the impact moving up and thru the body ... perfect exucution. Last, you define "laughing" as related to the play ... who can't make that judgement from the video?
Next, you state you can say this because of the rules. However, you have first defined the situation incorrectly, next you are apply the rule incorrectly. The is stately clearly ... and at no point is Eric's head used as a spear ... in fact, if he had, I would suggest that Eric would have a neck injury. If one wanted to ask Eric where he hurt ... I would suggest he said if anything his shoulder. He hit him so flush that I'm sure he didn't feel a thing ... just like a nice golf shot where you use all the correct muscles.
Lastly, you state that "not playing within the rules constitues dirty play" ... and it's pretty obvious, you have interpreted and applied this particular rule in a manner to be "trollish".
My thoughts of the hit was that it was a brutal hit. Eric did not have to use his full force in the hit, he could have let up and apply more of a block rather than a hit. If that is something Beebe would like to address or the NCAA I would welcome that. Set up a rules committee and set the policy. However, you can't suspend a player based on the rule this Tiger fan and Beebe have ... "upon further review" ... it just isn't there. From a coaching perspective, I would hope and think that Bo had a good conversation with Eric about his movements after the hit was made. Husker fans appreciate a good hit ... we do not applaud a taunt or the kind of movements that it looked like Eric made when the player was injured. I would suggest that some "in house" discipline be applied to sir Eric ... a suspension is simply not necessary according to the rules of the game.
Humble submitted,
SheepdogMark