Jump to content

Caveman

Members
  • Content Count

    62
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

55 Excellent

About Caveman

Recent Profile Visitors

426 profile views
  1. Agreed. If he had legitimate #2 potential (not counting last year), he would have earned a scholarship.
  2. Caveman

    CB Dontae Manning

    I wonder how much difference a 6-6 record (or better) from last season would have improved our recruiting efforts. Does that 4-8 cast doubt upon Frost?
  3. Caveman

    Maurice Washington Faces Charges

    There are just too many promising players for me to pick favorite- Wandale, Noa, Ty, Benhart, Rahmir, Luke, etc. It’s going to be fun when we can get them on the field.
  4. Caveman

    Athlon Quarterback Rankings

    Don't worry, its a quick read
  5. Caveman

    Athlon Quarterback Rankings

    But we have a star player under investigation for mistreating a former girlfriend...
  6. Caveman

    Holy $#@& Phil Steele

    That's very reasonable. When were Kool-Aid and/or alcohol banned in your county?
  7. Caveman

    Holy $#@& Phil Steele

    Absolutely. I would even be happy with less, as long there's a demonstrable improvement from last year to show recruits.
  8. Caveman

    QB Jacob Garcia

    What's the connection?
  9. 10-2 is crazier than 7-5. All of our question marks/deficiencies will have be addressed in order to reach 10-2. Key injuries and other bad luck (penalties, turnovers) could easily derail our season.
  10. I do not know the number, but Baker Mayfield & Kyler Murray come to mind. Edit: Also Will Grier, Cam Newton
  11. It all depends on how close you sit to the TV.
  12. Caveman

    DOJ Initial Russia Hearings

    What is required for exoneration? Can somebody comment on why Mueller would make that distinction? Is that his way of recommending further investigation?
  13. Caveman

    Maurice Washington Faces Charges

    I was referring to moral judgement, not the legality
  14. Caveman

    Maurice Washington Faces Charges

    Does it matter if the intent was to strictly embarrass a consensual party vs re-victimize an assault victim?
×