Archy1221

5 police officers tackling what seems to aBe an unarmed peaceful person who happens to be out past curfew seems like those procedures could use reform

Sounds good and sorry posting in the wrong thread. Not sure why it was stated this way by the previous poster but I appreciate how you handled it.

Ummmm...please re-read. As your post shows: 1) I never said people won’t wait longer than 60 days. I said the wait will be closer to 60 days. 2) I referenced Medicaid and free clinics, not Medicare. 3) There are many different private payers in our system of healthcare, there are government payers in our system of healthcare, there are public/private payers in our system of healthcare. We don’t have single payer!

How is that NOT on topic. A video post of how the police handled a guy for sin of being out past curfew?

You know how the rules of the Senate work don’t you

Why was it blocked? Could have provided much needed relief.

You guys...so funny. It’s like the get off my lawn in a different format ”this new kids, hmmppffff, they need to get off my huskerboard” almost forgot to post the rules

Sometime it’s amazing the dribble you post just to try to make an argument. we don’t have single payer in the US. We have multiple payers. Whatever town, city you live in and call your local cataract surgeon and ask the next available date you can get scheduled for an evaluation and surgery. I’m extremely confident in the data I presented.

Yes I do

Absolutely. If I worked in a bank I would have my deposits in said bank too. So I guess I would take out some of that money In the bank for my kids if they were in need. Sad that you wouldn’t.

@BlitzFirstis just arguing to argue. He can’t really be taken seriously if he thinks violently taking down an unarmed person who is not being belligerent or resisting for the crime of being out too late is normal.

I’m not saying anything. The cnn link speaks for itself.

No I think you should do your own work and answer your own question as was told to me. Those are apparently the rules and I’m just abiding by them.

It seems pretty aggressive behavior by the police in that situation.

https://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/ interesting how Obama won his first campaign primary.

And what new evidence emerged? Maybe Schiff wanted to do the bare minimum to get a partisan impeachment and throw it to the Senate to try and do his work for him. not the Senates job. Schiff should have brought an actual case instead of a sham As renowned Liberal constitutional law scholar Jonathan Turley eloquently said. your side tried and lost. Valiant effort trying to make a steak out of hamburger. Was just no there there

I didn’t ignore you, I chose to ask what I feel is a more relevant question. Why didn’t the House secure that testimony that was not in the Senate trial. isn’t that the basic rules in a nut shell? The House investigates and charges, presents the evidence to the Senate, and the Senate votes to convict or not convict. And yes I know that the Senate sets the rules of the Senate, just like the House sets the rules of the House. Schifty Schiff had every opportunity to get whatever evidence he wanted or thought was out there. He chose not to.

I have zero interest in paying for someone’s $100,000 private liberal arts college degree loans when it could have been done for 1/4 the cost

They are financially loose and I won’t slow my role. People chose to take out the loans knowing the rules. and yes let’s take a look at why college is so much more expensive. Go ahead and start with the access to all the easy loan money. Colleges are not stupid. So much more access to funds and prices magically raise. Go to CC for two years and state school for 2 years. It would take an exception to not afford that with minimal loans.

Why didn’t the House procure said evidence.

Ask Obama why they hold the student loans. And so instead of of just forgiving those loans, Let’s work to change the BK laws and allow the bankruptcy courts to decide how it should be handled like virtually every other debt. I advocated for this earlier. At least there is a penalty associated for being financially loose, to put it mildly, with their decisions.