Scarlet

Mar-a-largo ought to be hoot right about now.

This (#8) is what the Biden campaign asked Twitter to delete. Four of the five deleted tweets showed Hunter Biden's junk and were considered pornographic and violated Twitter's rules. Twitter deleted them. The Twitter dump by Musk turned out to be akin to Geraldo Rivera opening Al Capone's valve. There was no government censorship on Twitter and thus no violation of the first amendment unless it came from the Trump administration. Biden was not in office at the time. So what the right-wing is all foaming at the mouth about has nothing to do with this thread. It's just more deflection and gaslighting. It's telling though that this is their obsession when a their Leader is continuing his efforts to overthrow our democracy and terminate the Constitution. Priorities I guess.

Laughy O'lantern man does seems triggered today. Even more than usual.

Good for them. Spot on.

@Archy1221playing the tried and true, albeit wornout and entirely predictable, Trumpist card of accuse the other side of doing what you are in fact doing.

Twitter had a policy against allowing hacked materials to be posted due to the s#!t show of 2016. Twitter was told by law enforcement that the laptop was hacked. Twitter made the decision not to allow information about the laptop to be posted on Twitter even though a lot of that was already posted everywhere else and yet it still didn't change the election results. Did Twitter make a mistake? We would only be able to judge that in hindsight. Would it have mattered? No. The reason the right-wingers are frothing is because they wanted to use this to sway the election the way the Hillary's emails did in 2016. It didn't work so they're butt hurt. On top of that they're using it to once again try to turn people's attention from their cult leader's attempt to terminate the Constitution. Archy is doing what he does. Carry their water.

Telling that Steve Bannon's lackeys are triggered that their October surprise flatlined bigly. Like no other surprise has flatlined in our history. Even more telling is that they've not utter even one word of condemnation about their Leader's insistence that we terminate the Constitution and reinstate him into office. It's almost like their trying to desperately to change the focus.

^^^ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-grayzone/ So far left it almost right

Is Rep. Joyce on this board? His dodging questions sound familiar. He literally said he'd support Trump if he won the nomination. I'd say unbelievable but by now is anyone surprised Republicans would back a candidate that not only said he'd terminate the Constitution but tried to do just that before?

It's already been explained in this thread but reading is hard for MAGA when instead they'd much rather turn into another frothy conspiracy theory that ultimately falls flat.

Breitbart News....lolz

The cult is out in force saying Trump didn't call for dissolution of the Constitution. What??? Like was he just throwing out a hypothetical situation to have an academic discussion with the constitutional scholars that frequent Truth Social? Lol Of course they are conveniently forgetting that he's not in any way asking a hypothetical "what if there was election fraud?" That's easily refuted by his countless tweets and truths claiming election fraud. Trying to figure out how anyone can read this in the context of his two and half year assault on our election integrity and come away with anything other than he's calling for the dissolution of the Constitution is mind numbing.

Dude is proving to be every bit the unhinged fascist loving loon that Trump is.

Over a day this tweet is still up and she's still on Twitter. Going well

Good to see our country still has a sense of humor while the former president is actively calling for violent revolution. I don't know. I think we have it pretty good here as opposed to other former democracies no matter how flawed like say... Myanmar

Also, I'm not diminishing the need for excellent quarterback play especially in today's game but if I had to choose between great line play with average QB play vs average line play with great QB play I'll take the former every time. But I'm also Run the Damn Ball guy.

Terry Luck in 1975 before Ferragamo took over. 1977 through 1980 with Randy Garcia, Tom Sorley, Jeff Quinn He went four years, went 38-10 and was in the hunt for the national championship a couple of times until late in the season. I'd take that now in a heartbeat.

Where did I call them average?

Probably one of the grittiest performances by an I-back husker lore. Everyone knew he was going to get the ball and the option was pretty much off the table. Right up the gut and he wouldn't be denied. But the oline deserved a lot of the credit that day too. Osborne won a lot of games in the 70s with average QBs until Turner Gill showed up. He took things to a different level and then the same thing happened when Tommie took over. But still the oline was always stout.

Still the leader of the GOP telling everyone how it will be if he's elected in 2024. Or reinstated before then....lol

And with a great line you can win as Nebraska proved beating #16 KSU on the road with....... Matt Turman