N Sker

NU 41 R 13 Rush 261 Pass 194

NU: 38 NW: 20 Rush: 243 Pass: 186

Actually this is quite entertaining...

#rehashedrehash

NU: 30 MSU: 28 Rush: 243 Pass: 183

I have plenty of yard work if you need to feel REALLY good about yourself. Will supply beer...

Nicely put.

NU: 45 Ill: 17 Rush: 298 Pass: 198

NU: 30 Miami: 20 Ground: 217 Air: 186

How they respond will tell us a lot about the team overall...

Mo challenge? Looked like he was down

Did a relative of Bo' get fired from Fresno recently?

NU: 27 Fresh No: 10 Rush: 278 Pass: 187

N 42 McN 9 Rush 364 Pass 271

Completely agree, MSU will get trounced in the CCG.

What the furk did I just read?

You have me convinced. I'll be sending my letter today.

Whoever starts at QB, I'm hoping they come out as a team and simply dominate the game. The offense, defense and fans could really use something to look forward to. I thought TM was that guy during his first KState game, though it's gone downhill from there with far too much drama for Husker football.

Wisconsin hosed themselves. Best option would have been to kick a field goal with 19 seconds. I don't understand why the QB didn't spike the ball to stop the clock rather than take a knee, if in fact he did though it didn't look like it in live action. Either way, very poor decisions with only a few seconds left in the game.

I'd agree the heat was likely a factor thouigh it was for Wyoming possibly to a greater degree, no pun intended. The Husker sideline is in the shade prior to the visitor sideline.

I read this too Knapp. Interesting how all their focus is on QB activity. I don't think they've mentioned RBs at all. Should be interesting.

Huskers: 41 Cowboys: 13 Passing: 260 Rushing: 310

Exactly. And why should people trust the ATF more than the NRA? Where does the funding come from for either group?

Do these contract provide a 'lookback' period where something like a chargeback is assessed for infractions or sanctions?

Wouldn't mandatory background checks for criminal history and specific mental health issues be directed at those people? I think if you've committed a felony or have a history of mental instability, you shouldn't be able to purchase a firearm. Agreed . . . and what would you propose as an enforcement mechanism? Listen, i'm fine with background checks and investigating the mental history of those wanting to buy a firearm, but further than that, then you're infringing on the 2nd amendment rights... I'd agree here too though it's not a complete fix. A person's mental state can change for whaterver reason in no time all all that a background check wouldn't do any good at that point and time if they already had a gun.