dutch91701

It's not like our QB was injured or anything. Sorry we can't score 24 points every quarter. Does any game, in which we don't score 96 points, upset you? Your clueless, it's not the score. It's called maintaining the execution, fundamentals, and intensity for 4 qtrs. I'm clueless. You're (not "your")right. I feel bad for you if you can't understand that teams get hot and then cool off during a game. You must get really confused on a regular basis. Perhaps football isn't a good sport for you.

Especially after getting nut-tapped on that one play. It seriously looked like he sat up grabbing his package.

Squeaky clean. Hard to see this drawing a suspension, IMO. Weren't we saying this last week? Martin's hit was "cleaner" than this as Osborne clearly contacts Gabbert's helmet with his own helmet. I disagree. Some angles made it look like Martin's helmet was the first part of his body that made contact with the victim. Also, Martin had several aggravating factors not present here: 1) He left his feet to make the hit 2) The player never saw him coming 3) He flexed/celebrated after making the hit 4) He was seen laughing about something on the sideline 5) They victim was down on the carpet for a long time Now, I personally think all of these factors are irrelevant and should not have resulted in a suspension. But to old men in suits who feel compelled to show they are not going to be soft on "vicious hits," these factors were more than enough to pull the trigger. More importantly, none of those factors are present for Osborne's hit. But it's a QB.

Lol at the targeting posts^ Nice flash from your camera on the TV. Not exactly an official review. This clearly isn't the moment of impact, so why don't you let those of us with access to civilized technology and, most importantly, knowledge of football, make the decision. Post your picture then, genius. His shoulder pad is literally touching Martinez's leg. What more do you want? Really? You can tell where his shoulder pad is from that picture? I find that odd as the picture is from the other side of the hit and if you took it a split-second later, you'd probably see the helmet come into contact with the leg, which would be a visible point of contact as it would not be hidden behind Martinez's thigh.

Squeaky clean. Hard to see this drawing a suspension, IMO. Weren't we saying this last week? Martin's hit was "cleaner" than this as Osborne clearly contacts Gabbert's helmet with his own helmet.

What is wrong with you people? Why is nobody on this board willing to say how good we really are. There is always somebody to tear down any effort the Huskers put up. You people are ridiculous. We should be undefeated right now and you all are acting like we're struggling to be bowl eligible.

On behalf of the previous few posters, thank you. It's what I work hard for.

NU 45 ISU 16 Passing 203 Rushing 257

Seriously I though this was going to be a thread about a Cyclone player we're going to have to worry about next week. Apparently I was wrong.

Nice flash from your camera on the TV. Not exactly an official review. This clearly isn't the moment of impact, so why don't you let those of us with access to civilized technology and, most importantly, knowledge of football, make the decision.

What kind of sun dress do you wear when you watch the game? ^This

It's not like our QB was injured or anything. Sorry we can't score 24 points every quarter. Does any game, in which we don't score 96 points, upset you?

The Martinez leg hit was dirty but the Osborne and Meredith hits weren't. They touched helmets, but that's what happens when you hit someone, unless you LOWER YOUR HELMET and LEAD WITH THE CROWN.

Zac Lee's a good dude. He's been mature about getting played (or not played) behind Martinez and he comes in and is able to run the offense in the absence of our starter. Big thanks to Zac.

If you think you're one of the best teams in this conference, why would we sink lower when you leave? We will be solidly the 3rd best team in the conference. This concept may be-well actually it undoubtably will be-over your head, but what he's saying is that the strength of the coference will take a huge hit with us leaving, making the Big 12-2 the Midwestern equivalent of the Big East. Maybe one team will rise up every once in a while, but like the West Virginias and Cinncinattis of the world, you will ultimately fail and do so miserably.

That Roy Helu is an absolute rapist.

Too bad the OP couldn't have suffered a helmet-to-helmet hit.

Yes, Nebraska fans are terrible people for chanting "overrated". They may as well go out and beat puppies with kittens.

Oh really? Your blurry video proves nothing. From that angle it looks just as likely that the helmet could have moved due to a whiplash-type effect.

Did anyone else notice the suspiciously long last second as well?

Big 12 Rules Section 3. Reviewable Plays Side Line, Goal Line, End Line Article 1. Reviewable plays governed by a sideline, goal line or an end line include: a. Scoring plays, including a runner in possession of a live ball breaking the plane of a goal line. b. A pass ruled complete, incomplete or intercepted at a side line, goal line or an end line. c. A runner or pass receiver ruled in or out of bounds. d. Recovery of a loose ball in or out of bounds in the field of play or an end zone. Passes Article 2. Reviewable plays involving passes include: a. A pass ruled complete, incomplete or intercepted anywhere in the field of play or an end zone. b. A legal forward pass touched by an ineligible receiver. c. A legal forward pass touched by a defensive player. d. A fumble ruled on the part of a potential passer. (Note: If the on-field ruling is forward pass and the pass is incomplete, the play is not reviewable). e. A forward pass or forward handing ruled when a runner is beyond the line of scrimmage. f. A forward pass or forward handing ruled after a change of possession. g. A pass ruled forward or backward when thrown from behind the line of scrimmage. (Exception: If the pass is ruled forward and is incomplete, the play is not reviewable). Miscellaneous Article 3. Miscellaneous reviewable plays include: a. A runner judged to have been not down by rule. (Note: If a runner is ruled down, the play is not reviewable). b. A runner’s forward progress with respect to a first down. c. Touching of any type kick by any player. d. The number of players participating by either team during a live ball. e. A scrimmage kicker beyond the line of scrimmage when the ball is kicked. f. Clock adjustment when a ruling on the field is reversed. g. A fumble recovery by a Team A player during fourth down or a try and before any change of possession.

EDIT: Deleted post.