I Backs back

[Twodocs]

I wonder if Watson and TO have some new option plays to use some of Bo's new weapons. I bet TO would have some fun with these guys when it comes to Suh and Cody and Burkhead and his recievers! Any observations so far?

[Vince from ShamWOW]

Yes, but I'm certain you don't want to hear/ read it.

[Enhance]

[carlfense]

I wonder if Watson and TO have some new option plays to use some of Bo's new weapons. I bet TO would have some fun with these guys when it comes to Suh and Cody and Burkhead and his recievers! Any observations so far?

tufftiger?

[Dundermifflinite]

Pretty sure Bill called them I-backs too.

[redout22]

I want to see more option but if what we have now works, no need to change it.

[tmfr15]

The term I-back was never dropped, even though the FB took on a lesser role under BC. I think that staff thought that if they said the RBs were I-backs and then kept Turner around, people would think that tradition was being honored. How lame is that?

[huskered17]

It did seem we had trouble, down at the goal line, before Cody ran it in. It doesn't seem that we have a true full back, or at least one that's getting playing time. Call them what you want, I/back, running back,or half back we still need that big body type down near the goal line. That was not a big line they were going against, compared to what they will be seeing. IMO

 

GBR!!!

[jjamuss]

It did seem we had trouble, down at the goal line, before Cody ran it in. It doesn't seem that we have a true full back, or at least one that's getting playing time. Call them what you want, I/back, running back,or half back we still need that big body type down near the goal line. That was not a big line they were going against, compared to what they will be seeing. IMO

 

GBR!!!

I agree... from what Wats said this morning at the breakfast, he called Lester Ward their "thumper" back. So maybe LW gets some touches this weekend?