gratefullred Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Wasnt Enunwa one of the recruits we supposedly fell back to after missing with some other bigger name, more stars, recruits? Not bad for 3 stars. Quote Link to comment
Apathy Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 If Enunwa can catch the ball and become a threat in our passing game than I'm all for it. We need more playmakers in the WR spot that can actually catch the ball. Quote Link to comment
husker98 Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 i'm not getting my hopes up. I like the kid and i think his husker career will be a good one, BUT lets wait and see. I prefer kids who are a surprise and step up and do what needs too be done too get the W. Quote Link to comment
74Hunter Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 I would rather see him redshirt, and have the JUCO kid play some snaps. I just don't want to see him burn a shirt, ala C******n style. Quote Link to comment
M I K E Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 It concerns me a little that a true freshman is good enough to see playing time. I think our WR and QB play will be the biggest factor if we are BCS bound or not. Quote Link to comment
Joe_5700 Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 It concerns me a little that a true freshman is good enough to see playing time. I think our WR and QB play will be the biggest factor if we are BCS bound or not. I was saying the same thing back in 1997. Why on earth was that Davison guy starting as a true Frosh? Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Doesn't concern me if it's at WR or RB. Those are positions where young players CAN step in and excel. Quote Link to comment
RockyMountainOySker Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Out of any position on the field that had to start a true freshman, I'd pick a WR. Quote Link to comment
Joe_5700 Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Out of any position on the field that had to start a true freshman, I'd pick a WR. My pick is special teams. Quote Link to comment
RockyMountainOySker Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Out of any position on the field that had to start a true freshman, I'd pick a WR. My pick is special teams. Nice doooood. I guess I should have clarified but thought you would have assumed we weren't talking special teams. Quote Link to comment
bleedNUred Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 We need talent at WR so this is good news. Quote Link to comment
akhskrfan Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 It concerns me a little that a true freshman is good enough to see playing time. I think our WR and QB play will be the biggest factor if we are BCS bound or not. I was saying the same thing back in 1997. Why on earth was that Davison guy starting as a true Frosh? Bobby Newcombe too Quote Link to comment
95huskers Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 it seems like every other school in america can play true frosh. accept nebraska. It seems like the system was always to complicated for true frosh to play and make a difference. i say if you have an athlete that can help the team put him on the field. im excited to see athletes make plays Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.