RedDenver Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 Florida (4-5) is ranked 14 spots higher than Nebraska (7-2). Luckily, the BCS uses Pure ELO, because that is absurd. We just need a 16 team playoff so we don't have to worry about all of this opinionated based crap anymore. It's hard to think the computer ranking is "opinionated". Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 To some extent, these computer figures have to be subjective. Who decides that SOS (Florida) weighs much more heavily than wins and losses (Nebraska)? Florida is 4-5. I repeat, Florida has a losing record. Quote Link to comment
RedDenver Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 To some extent, these computer figures have to be subjective. Who decides that SOS (Florida) weighs much more heavily than wins and losses (Nebraska)? Florida is 4-5. I repeat, Florida has a losing record. Of course it's subjective, but it cannot be "opinionated" like a human poll because it's based on an algorithm that doesn't know anything about the teams other than their stats. Quote Link to comment
JTrain Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 From what I have learned here, any system that ranks Nebraska highly is a fair and wise one. Any one that doesn't is absurd and biased. It's true that the value system used in formulating a computer rating is subjective. But once it's set in motion, every single game is judged with the exact same weight. It's impossible for a human to take into account all 500+ games that have been played and the tens of thousands of ways those results correlate. Here's a huge compilation of (primarily computer) ranking systems. Nebraska's average is 39 and Florida's is 49. Have a look at some of these and you will get an idea of which ratings might fit your value system. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.