NebraskaHarry

Well phenotypes are physical expressions... Hair color, body patterns, ect... of which are derived from genes during development. My point being I don't believe there is a gene that makes anyone gay.

Well phenotypes are physical expressions... Hair color, body patterns, ect... of which are derived from genes during development.

I would not consider the behavior of homosexuality to be a phenotype that is derived genotypically.

Your post is lacking. No one said that you can't have sex other than procreate but sex's primary function is to procreate. Also humans get together for a mate for a variety of reasons just not finding the hottest girl to bang. There is a reason why most people have labeled girls they would bang but never form a relationship with and vice versa. Animals don't have the though capabilities of humans. How do you know that believing in God isn't natural? You said yourself you can't be sure God doesn't exist. Marriage primary function is survival. Gay marriage doesn't survive. Given the fact that gays are in the minority it alone isn't natural to humans to be gay. mmmmm I disagree. So you are telling me there are more gays than straight? Noooo, I'm saying I disagree with your notion that because gays are in the minority that being gay is not natural. I don't find that a valid argument on the definition of natural.

Your post is lacking. No one said that you can't have sex other than procreate but sex's primary function is to procreate. Also humans get together for a mate for a variety of reasons just not finding the hottest girl to bang. There is a reason why most people have labeled girls they would bang but never form a relationship with and vice versa. Animals don't have the though capabilities of humans. How do you know that believing in God isn't natural? You said yourself you can't be sure God doesn't exist. Marriage primary function is survival. Gay marriage doesn't survive. Given the fact that gays are in the minority it alone isn't natural to humans to be gay. mmmmm I disagree.

mmmmm I would disagree.

The coaches have been pretty high on Valentine from everything I've heard and read. Thank the lord we got him last year. It would have been nice to get a juco this year, but I think a year of strength and conditioning with the tackles we have on team already can go along way towards next season. At this point I think our starters are Ankrah, Rome, Valentine, and ? ... I'm pulling for McMullen.

Obviously could be anywhere, but I'd say San Diego is a possibility.......... I'd say San Diego too.

Thank God we got Valentine last year.

I don't think he leaves Oregon. But if he did, where in the NFL. Kansas City? San Diego? Cleveland? New York Jets?

Welcome to college football.

May as well.. I mean how many bowl chances is he gonna have at Kentucky? Am I right fellas?

Don't play with us.. Oh sorry, thats just my confidence and eternal optimism coming out. They dont come out very often so i thought i'd let them out to plsy. Sorry!!

After reading everything I have to read on this guy I think it might be NU and ASU as his top 2. My heart wants him N, but my gut says ASU.

I heard he was going with Saban to Cleveland and be his DC. Who know I guess. A 1 year defensive backs coach at Nebraksa is going to be the DC for an NFL team?! Zap Brannigan "You must have smoked some bad granola." swing and a miss

We're definitely a top 5 running back university in my opinion.

It's aboot time and this is some good news eh!

Taylor : You smell of alcohol and taco meat Bo : A lot.

I'm in favor of gay marriage and individuals practicing the second amendment. Never thought either threatened our families.

And you're correct about on purpose and accident... But it's not the cars fault and it's not the guns fault either.

Yeah, and he says you probably should be able to buy them. You are able to "bare" that arm, and the Constitution says that. Also you can own a cannon. The girl I dated in high school, dad had two of them. How come we don't ban cars? Cars kill thousands of people every year. It's easily preventable. We just have to ban cars. I think you are confusing "On purpose" and "accident" Now, had this a-hole drove his car into the school, down the halls, into the offices, into the classrooms, ran over 20 kids, 6 adults, then got out of the the car, rigged it so that it would "drive" over himself, ending his life, THEN you would have an argument. Until then, not so much. It is okay to be mad, to be filled with anger and hate right now, that's okay. It really is, you don't have to try to be "rational" guy right now. This is not an "If...Then" type of moment, this is a "let people vent" moment. You know that, come on. Not mad.. sad, yes. But this is a discussion that is going to be talked about. I don't think any of us are preventing people from venting right now either. This is an issue that goes further than guns.

Yeah, and he says you probably should be able to buy them. You are able to "bare" that arm, and the Constitution says that. Also you can own a cannon. The girl I dated in high school, dad had two of them. How come we don't ban cars? Cars kill thousands of people every year. It's easily preventable. We just have to ban cars.

It's a simple question. Are we allowed to place limitations on the people's right to bear arms? If not, why can't I go buy a missile launcher to defend myself? Missile Launchers are explosives. And you can not own explosives above a 'fireworks' grade, and in some places not even that. Explosives are not 'firearms'. To the earlier with apples and oranges. The fact the other counties even have gun related murders means the gun bans are ineffective. People still got their hands on guns, in some cases on an island, even being illegal to own. And there you go.

It's not about hunters. Then why do you need a semi-automatic? Why does anyone need a television? or a lot of the things we Americans want? It's about the second amendment and the right to bear arms. Does the right to bear arms include a canon? An F16? Maybe a nuclear bomb? Because if no limitations are allowed, why can't I go buy a missile launcher?

It's not about hunters. Then why do you need a semi-automatic? Why does anyone need a television? or a lot of the things we Americans want? It's about the second amendment and the right to bear arms.