BigRedBuster

An interesting read on the subject.

The internet is a much different animal now than in 2014. That's almost 4 years ago. That's a millennium in technology. Let me ask you this. Why do you support this move? I am honestly open to the argument from the other side. I just don't understand what that other side is and would like it explained to me. How was this regulation detrimental.

Seems like these two comments fit together. This staff is not going to waste their time right now on players that are just using us as a place holder.

So...answer me this. What is our marquee non-con game in 2020?

I'm not a fan of these games.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/14/technology/net-neutrality-repeal-explainer/index.html

Thanks.

I know what you are saying. But....this is the answer I'm trying to look past.

OK...I'm going to ask this knowing it may be hard to actually get what I'm looking for. Can anyone point to an article that articulates the purpose of doing this is? I know, the mantra if catering to big corporations..bla bla bla. But, the FCC has to have had some type of argument as to why they should do this. But..I didn't know the board was a partisan board.

I didn't realize the FCC was split between the two parties.

Why should he. He's talked to Putin about it.

I'm having a hard time understanding what the Title IV issue is. I thought that was basically just number of scholarships that affects that. So, if 10 kids walk-on to the football program, that shouldn't affect Title IV. What am I missing?

This has been a big frustration of mine this year. I would have thought we would have had way more wide open WRs. We have told talent at the position. We had a good coach teaching rout running. We had two coaches who supposedly were good at designing a passing attack. But, we ended up with WRs having to constantly catch balls with tight coverage or in traffic. It always puzzled me.

Every time I listen to something like this from Fox, I just shake my head thinking about how they don't even hide they are the propaganda machine for Republicans.

I fully understand and can appreciate this feeling. I have felt it too. I work hard to separate my own Christianity from what many Americans have made Christianity into. They are two very different things.

I personally think it's that he has absolutely no clue what he's talking about so, either he realizes that or people around him have realized that and told him to shut his mouth and don't say anything about specifics. They had to throw something out there, so the easiest thing to do is just say...."We are going to drop the corporate tax rate to 20% and give everyone the biggest tax cut in the history of the world." He would have absolutely no clue how to talk about specifics and if he did, it would look like the Roy Moore representative interview with Jake Tapper. So.....Funhusker, is right in that he will trumpet and sign anything that comes to his desk written by Republicans.

That is a quote that maybe should be watched and put into context. I can't tell if Mulvaney is saying "Foxnews is the only place that is talking about the truth and how great it is"..... or...."Every other news source is honest about the bill and Fox isn't".

Don’t you just love how this Republican Party supports law enforcement.

Nope.....no propaganda here.