NM11046

Sorry folks are being so rude to you. There are a number of spots that sell Husker sweatshirts online, you may not find this one exactly, but you will see lots of others. Try: http://shop.huskers.com/COLLEGE_Nebraska_Cornhuskers_Sweatshirts_And_Fleece/source/google-ak19kv30-nba-campaign?utm_campaign=NCAA+-+Nebraska+Cornhuskers+-+GKs%7C623767410&utm_medium=ppc&ks_id=6248_kw16270115&utm_term=nebraska%20sweatshirt&matchtype=e&utm_source=g&target=kwd-474276490&pcrid=97932630377&adposition=1t1 http://www.fansedge.com/Nebraska_Cornhuskers_Sweatshirts/browse/partnerid/14071/source/gfe12-ncaa?utm_campaign=NCAA+-+FSAB+GKs+-+Nebraska%7C103398895&utm_medium=ppc&ks_id=6137_kw3845115&utm_term=nebraska%20sweatshirt&matchtype=e&utm_source=g&target=kwd-474276490&pcrid=67699891135&adposition=1t3&gclid=Cj0KEQjw0MW9BRDxtYTn2_S699MBEiQAw33y47q86IeKFTl9SNdY5ONisXw-71cXPXngfSV-VrkqVSAaAn-P8P8HAQ

I think what Coach Riley means by that is that they would like to hear from Coach Williams before making any moves. They haven't spoken to him as of yet, and to make any decisions before that is very rash. Shoot, Dub might quit on his own.

I didn't hear it that way at all. I heard, "we don't know everything, we haven't spoken to our employee, we have a plan and part of that is ramifications".

he was drinking these things called Elk Creeks' and somebody gave him a brownie.

Which is so stupid. My understanding is that the accident was just a fender bender. What a fool.

Everybody handles their liquor different and looks different when they're drunk. If you could gauge drunk by a picture we wouldn't need breathalyzers. Silly comment.

Mine gets inflamed due to some gait issues I have (arthritic toes). There are a few good stretches you can do to help. I'll gather some to show you if you like. Sucks huh?

I think the GA that had been working with WR's is Hardie Buck: http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=100&ATCLID=210175343 At least Buck has been there for two years and benefitted I'm sure from Dub's mentoring and teaching. Also is good that we've got some Seniors WRs that can take leadership roles. Horrible situation. I can't stop thinking of the adversity this team has had to face. From Bo to the transition from Bo, to Sam to this on top of last years season. If adversity makes you stronger this will be a phenomenal group of young men by the time they graduate.

Size continues to be a recurrent issue for him. All he cares about is the number of crazies at his rally's and how CNN covers it.

Hmmmmmm - isn't that exactly the definition?

He was arrested for driving while drunk.... What details are you waiting on? What more do you need to know before you'll criticize his behavior? Criticize and crucify are two very different things. Criticize all you want, its obvious he made a bad decision and it sounds like it's not the first time. Crucify - for that I want all the details.

As I've said before, both are terrible candidates and we are faced with bad choices. I am not happy with the current trajectory in this country, as most Americans feel the same with nearly 70% claiming the US is on the wrong track. With Hillary, we would be getting more of the same, but likely worse as she has the corruption to go along with the failed policies of the past 7 years, especially when it comes to ISIS and foreign policy. With Trump, he's a wildcard, and he's obnoxious and says a lot of crazy things to get attention, but we really don't know how he would govern. So yes, there is a risk there, but given the 70% wrong track of this country (which I agree with), I am willing to take that risk. Now if the Dems had nominated someone like Jim Webb, I would agree with you that he would be far better than Trump. Hillary, not so much. Or, if Johnson would agree to move down to the VP slot and let Romney lead the Libertarian ticket, I would vote for that in a heartbeat. I would love to see the poll on here add another option with a Romney/Johnson ticket just to see if it changes the results. Both are poor candidates, but it's plain as day that one is definitively worse than the other. No one wants Hillary in office but it's very clear that Trump is grossly unfit for office at any level, let alone POTUS. It's not even a risk with Trump. There is absolutely no way that a Trump presidency would be anything but detrimental to the American people. He needs to be defeated and defeated soundly. If you can't see this then you must be entirely removed from logic. And that is YOUR opinion, and I know a few others on this tiny board we post on. I know just as many non-political individuals that I work with as well as some of my friends that fear Hillary more than Trump as they believe Trump says some of the things he does as part of his TV personality. When you look at Trump's proposals (outside of the Muslim ban), which proposals are you most concerned with? Securing our border? Removing unfair trade deals? Increase the child tax credit? Not starting more wars like Iraq? Calling an entire race of people rapists is because of his TV personality? Calling global warming a hoax created by the Chinese to make US manufacturing non-competitive is part of his TV personality? Having not one clue what is happening in the world and blaming stuff that happened 12 years ago on Obama is part of his TV personality? The man is a complete and utter dipsh*t. There simply is no defending him using reason or logic. Falling asleep at the wheel when requests have been made for a year in Benghazi for additional security is acceptable? And then lying to the families as to why their loves ones were killed is acceptable? How about trashing females who were victimized by her husband's sexual addiction? Or perhaps dodging questions about wiping her server clean ("you mean with a cloth" stated Clinton). You want to make this black and white that one is so much better than the other. Both are terrible candidates, and when given the chance, I would take my chance with Trump over a known failure in Clinton. If you're going to make this about which candidate has more downfalls then it will be Trump every single time. He makes shocking and unconstitutional statements on a near daily basis to the point that it's hardly newsworthy anymore. One candidate absolutely is better than the other. Hillary Clinton has actually held positions that would prepare her for the White House, and if EMAILS is the only thing you can bring up to paint her as a failure then it sounds to me that she wouldn't be nearly as bad as the global disaster we would have on our hands with Trump. Hillary Clinton has held 2 positions. As Senator of New York, she promised to bring 200,000 jobs to upstate New York, and failed to deliver. She also voted in favor of the Iraq war. If she's such a great leader with great judgment, she would have opposed the war back then. Moving on to Secretary of State, nearly everything she touched was a disaster. Lybia, Syria, Iraq, etc... all got worse with her foreign policy, and as I've shown many times before, ISIS was wiped out in 2008 according to Obama's CIA director, and has now grown tremendously. And this isn't even talking about the Benghazi debacle or her email woes. Why on earth should she deserve a promotion when she couldn't handle a Secretary position? And Trump has spewed comments about how successful and rich he is and yet can't back it up. What IS documented is his lack of business success with 4 bankruptcies. He promised thousands of jobs and then bailed. He has CHOSEN to not pay those who have provided him goods and services. Don't care if Hillary missed her promise on jobs - he absolutely harmed peoples livelihood. And continues to do it. He uses labor from outside the US for his staff, and to make his goods. There are over 4000 lawsuits against him (including 190+ related to not paying taxes, or not paying enough taxes). He has admittedly created business to take advantage of the very people that he know attracts as followers (white collar, uneducated men) and is dealing with some of those ramifications as he battles the Trump University cases. Moving on to his documented comments that insult and harass almost every sex, creed, religion and nationality. His lack of understanding of national, international or state side politics, and even more so his lack of desire to even try to learn about it. I can't believe I even bothered to respond to you and this circular conversation. I don't have enough time or energy to continue typing all the evidence of his lack of qualifications or that he's even a good, sane person. I take great comfort in the fact that you seem to be one of few on this board that has refused to open his eyes as to the qualifications of this office and the risk Don presents if he were to get close to occupying it.

Good summary. Thank you.

See now 84 - you could have made your point without tying it to politics and I would have +1 you because it's solid, fact based and fair. Rational even. Then you had to go on a diatribe about all your other nutball issues and accusations. No need. Not the place. Go to the threads where it's appropriate (and where people have stopped responding to you because you're crazy).

?

NO, NO,NO 3rd offense and 2nd in Lincoln. No recruit or win is worth keeping this liability on staff. He's a lost cause that is begging to kill someone. Where did you see/hear that it's his second in Lincoln? Doesn't match up with what I've read.

In the case of a felony, you're (almost) always there until your arraignment. They need to set bond, and that's not done until arraignment. Therefore, you're in the slammer until then, because you can't bond out. Thank you - this entire situation is so stupid and sad.

The actions of one man do not define a program. How the "program" and the university respond to William's situation will be more telling.

So I think there are some legal folks on here - why would he still be in police custody?

These 2 comments seriously make me wonder how anyone can possibly put football results over the fact that he is the suppose to be a role model first. Results on the field are secondary when it comes to this stuff. If he gets retained I will lose a lot of respect for the University and Mike Riley I certainly don't Coach T - just trying to get my head around the entire situation, and we don't have a full understanding of all the facts. Certainly his role puts him in another level for discipline. I don't have much doubt what will be announced at the press conference Riley is going to have to hold, and I don't think you'll have to sacrifice your respect for the university.

That does make me feel a bit better - hoping that we also find out that the citations aren't all alcohol related. Would make it easier for him to find another job someday.

No matter what ends up happening - please, please, please LPD, don't release a Mug Shot.

Honestly, my bigger fear (based on where he was arrested) is that he was out w/Lewis' coaches or something. Not only would the loss of his job be a no brainer, but I'd think it would hurt our team with the NCAA.

When your job involves being a public ambassador, an educator, and a mentor to young men, it's a different scenario and our football program can not in any way endorse this wreckless behavior or send a message that we disapprove, but we're not going to make you suffer any consequences. Fair enough. I guess there is still some gray in it for me based on not knowing the entire story. I don't doubt Riley will do right by Williams and the team. Do we know how long ago the other 2 DUIs were? Also, what ended up happening with the USC coach that had similar issues this year?

Demopublicans Or Demopublitarians might be better. All you Johnson lovers crack me up thinking this guy is perfect and the only honest politician out there. He's lied about his past record as governor when running in 2012, and is just your typical politician. https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=210816 Also, it seems that the Johnson supporters on here are following the lead of Johnson himself, always taking a chance to criticize Trump, but taking it much easier on Hillary. It's not a shock to anyone on here on why this is happening given there is much more overlap between the GOP and Libertarian platforms than there are between the Libertarian and Democratic platforms. http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/gary-johnson-criticize-hillary-trump/ Wat? Nobody on here has said they are in love with Johnson lock step. We've just said he's the only true alternative that isn't an embarrassment. Trump is a POS and Hillary is about as slimmy as a hagfish. Johnson at least has something to offer to both conservatives and liberals in his agenda. He doesn't offer anything to this liberal. I can see why conservatives may think him an option but it really depends on the issues that are important to you. AND, he's not going to win. A vote for him will make the chances of Don being elected higher. Poor way a thinking... I don't agree with Johnson on a few issues, but after reviewing all the candidates positions tha knap posted, I'm surprisingly more in line with him than any of the others. What part of this do you think is a poor way of thinking? Like Harry said, most of the people voting for him would probably check the name with an R beside it in a typical election. This cycle is anything but typical as we all know. Also, even though I used to think it as well, the wasted vote cliché is lazy thinking. If everyone has that attitude then, yes, he won't win and nothing will change. We're not locked into these two party races it's just lazy thinking by the populous and good marketing by the parties. Well the polls and data that is available show he's getting most of his support from D's and Clinton voters. I'd agree that in some scenarios the wasted vote doesn't make sense, but in CO, NH, NM, and other purple states it is the truth. Sadly right now we are locked into a two party race, whether we remain that way after this election is a question that has some legs to it.