Archy1221

Absolutely. Nice to have some competency in that room for a change.

Oh, sorry. Since you used those words, I take everything back. LOL

This was quite unfortunate

Are you talking about the ones that didn’t actually vote and are subject to various prosecutions while having no impact on the election because the checks and balances worked? Those ones?

Words matter and you will need to address the words these SCOTUS judges spoke and the words used in the decision to make Roe v Wade rightfully no longer exist as it was wrongfully decided (even Saint Ginsberg agreed with this) I’m hoping you understand SCOTUS didn’t outlaw abortion though, and I’m also hoping you understand why it’s a States Right issue and why Roe was rightfully overturned. Speaking if the Federalist Society, do you think every Democrat SCOTUS pick comes from some virtuous non biased recommendation? LOL.

This is true and not in dispute by me. Fact check true

He still looks really really good for a kid that could still be in HS

Geesh, someone tried to take out Fidone’s knee at the goal line. Pretty stupid play in a spring game obviously not done on purpose, but be smarter

Another fun fact. You, on these various pages of HB, have chosen to downplay most every R misdeed and have defended to ridiculous extents the wrong side of virtually every issue that your favored GOP party holds dear That actually wouldn’t be a fact, that would be an opinion…one that is misguided.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/dont-leave-valuables-parked-cars-213121352.html LOS ANGELES (AP) — San Francisco has earned an unwelcome national reputation for car burglaries that U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff was reminded of the hard way: The Democratic congressman had his luggage swiped from his car while it was parked in a downtown garage.

This has happened?? Was giving Ukraine Javelin missiles being pro-Putin? The missiles Obama wouldn’t give. Downplaying Russia strength in 2012, allowing a Crimea takeover..I guess BHO is pro-Putin I think it was pretty clear to anyone and everyone that Trump or Biden would have legally challenged the results of an extremely close election, and when those legal challenges lost, both would have left the WH which is what happened. I know I was told by people on this board, maybe even you that Orange Man Bad wouldn’t leave the WH even if he lost. Yeah….if you consider Jan 6 a coup, we are screwed once China and Russia realize how easy it will be to take us over. Who needs Nukes when you can get 3,000 rag tag citizens to take over Washington. I certainly got this wrong. However you feel about abortion…Roe V Wade was not settled in a lawful way. SCOTUS correctly settled that. Good on them. I didn’t think they would have the guts to make the correct and hard decision. Now it’s rightfully up to Congress to make national abortion law. Until then, it’s up to the States as it should be when Congress hasn’t regulated it through law. That’s kinda how our system is set up. First off, you and others constantly said she was the future of the Republican party and a current leader. That still isn’t true. Whatever influence you think she has, is confined to about 10 other looney members of Congress who are as looney as her. Similar to “The Squad” on the other side. And didn’t Marge get kicked off a committee assignment? Fun fact….The President isn’t elected by popular vote. Here’s another fun fact…The President is immune from some laws us normies must follow, so are Congresspeople. The question for SCOTUS and what they are deciding is when does immunity stop.

He even gets a “normies” reference in @teachercd

As in?

MSFT showed good AI growth last night and they aren’t even the leaders in the space. Bringing up the AI players.

That’s pretty good advice!

Yeah, I've seen that. The conservative justices want to delay it as long as possible so it further delays some of his trials so they aren't decided before the election. How do you know this?

Sucks for those kids that the school has a spineless administration.

Correct. This attorney did not turn down the case it seems since he/she is arguing the case.

At a certain point, shouldn't a person look themselves in the mirror and say "wow, I'm actually going to step in front of SCOTUS and say that attempting a coup attempt, ordering the military to commit a coup, or assassinating a political rival should be allowed by Presidential immunity. Maybe this entire political movement is f#&%ing stupid, enabled by the lowest dredges of society, and I probably shouldn't be doing this" Do you even understand what a defense attorney does? Does this mean the argument is going to win? Hopefully not, but that is their job when they take the job.

No, Republicans in Congress are not his personal lawyers. I don’t believe the President has absolute immunity, it is an interesting case to follow though, and I’d have to look up which members of Congress are making those statements beyond the MTG’s and Boebarts of the world.

Isn’t it his lawyers job to make these arguments on his behalf? Even if they end of losing said arguments.

This is a good summary so far

@BigRedBusterI remember you bringing up the dangers of AI. Check this crazy story out.