Archy1221

It’s a who’s who list of “intelligence experts” that signed a letter and said the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian Disinformation.

I’ve begun questioning this many years ago and 51 intelligence experts have confirmed much of my suspicions in Oct of 2020.

It funny, people are doing what you suggest and taking it up with Disney and giving commentary about Disney’s reaction to the law. But earlier they were told they are trolling themselves.

Actually the bill doesn’t address gay,straight, lesbian, bi, etc….just the aspect of teaching sex in k-3rd grade and age appropriate content from there on. That is unless you have different information than what is published. Disney’s “truth” doesn’t actually mean that what they say is true

Sure, but what does that have to do with Alex’s misleading tweet that @BigRedBusterhappily shared?

The bill doesn’t cap insulin costs for everyone at $35/month. Why doesn’t Brian tell his followers this? Is it possible this is why the R’a voted against the bill?

I think you misspelled false here. As in said false things about the legislation.

How much different was our response and outcomes to other EU countries we are commonly compared to? Is their foreign policy excluding global disease monitoring?

“Based on the price of oil, I’ve also instructed the Secretary of Energy to purchase at a very good price large quantities of crude oil for storage in the U.S. strategic reserve,” he said at a March 13 briefing from the Rose Garden. Of course, it got blocked by the Chuckster so we could pay higher prices today. Brilliant.

Nope, they prob expect to just have the Jan 6th committee and reporters look at ALL the info turned in before making false stories that constantly need corrected or retracted.

Every single time it seems

I know and agree…..Disney is making false statements about a FL bill and apparently the Governor isn’t too pleased with it and wondering why Disney should get the special “Vatican” rule that others don’t seem to get, while falsely disparaged the State. Maybe he Seems he thinks Disney might be better served to have the same rules as other companies in the state?

Yep, Covid was lying in wait for the 2020 election year. Great take!!

No one on the board says they don’t want immigrants than I am aware of. It’s the illegal component that’s discussed. With that said Alex has a few issues…. #1….Social Security and Medicare are not welfare benefits. So ask why he puts those numbers into his tweet? #2….Native born people are more likely to have more credits into the social security system than immigrants as a whole. Kinda makes sense that people working more years, higher incomes, are eligible for more money out. #3….Native born people who work their entire adult lives pay into the Medicare system (allowing Medicare trust fund to generate revenue longer from that money) more than immigrants who come over at age 40-60 and collect benefits when eligible. So it’s possible that the net/net is different than what Alex shows. That’s not an indictment on immigrants it’s just a reality. So the better analysis would be to see what’s paid in vs what’s paid out for each group.

Oh Simon. Good effort, maybe you convinced some of the ignorant who aren’t paying attention. Can anyone tell me why the Biden Admin has brought back (not created as those jobs were lost during 2020 forced shutdowns) those jobs? Maybe explain the backstory of why those people were unemployed? Might give a good indicator as to why the jobs numbers for Trump admin look the way they look AT THE END OF 2020. Does Simple Simon want to look at the 2017-2019 numbers? Probably not.

Question….would they be “regulating them to death” if the action taken was to take away a special way of doing business that virtually no other business in the state gets and make them equal to everyone else?

Seems like a crazy amount of States this is happening with, both R and D controlled.

LOL

In regards to the 5th article….it is a rehash of the first article

In regards to the fourth article….it is a complete rehash of the third article

In regards to the third article, the lawsuit by the complaining group was just filed in March so don’t we kinda need to wait and see how the FEC responds to get an idea of why the “inaction”??

Read the link… The Commission failed by a vote of 3-3 to: . Find reason to believe that Donald J. Trump, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and Bradley T. Crate in his official capacity as treasurer, and the Donald J. Trump Foundation violated 52 U.S.C. § 30125(e) by soliciting, receiving, directing, transferring, or spending soft money in connection with the Fundraiser during the 2016 election cycle. c. Take no action at this time with respect to the allegations that Corey Lewandowski, Madeline Campbell Burr, Hope Hicks, Stuart Jolly, Brad Parscale, Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump, Donald Trump, Jr., Allen Weisselberg, Jeff McConney, and the Trump Organization violated 52 U.S.C. § 30125(e) by soliciting, receiving, directing, transferring, or spending soft money in connection with the Fundraiser during the 2016 election cycle. d. Find no reason to believe that Donald J. Trump and Donald J. Trump Foundation violated the Act in connection with the $25,000 donation to And Justice for All. e. Approve the Factual and Legal Analysis, as recommended in the First General Counsel’s Report dated May 30, 2019. f. Direct the Office of General Counsel to revise the Factual and Legal Analysis circulated on May 31, 2019, as recommended in the Supplemental Submission dated March 24, 2020. g. Authorize pre-probable cause conciliation with Donald J. Trump for President and Bradley T. Crate in his official capacity as treasurer, and Donald J. Trump Foundation, and Donald J. Trump. h.

From the second article…. “Having concluded the investigation, the record before the Commission does not sufficiently establish the extent of the potential violations to support further action, and the investigation is unlikely to uncover additional information without the expenditure of significant additional resources. Moreover, the violations appear to have expired under the five-year statute of limitations,” says the FEC general counsel’s second report, which was signed by officials in August. Trump didn’t run in 2014 Shana Broussard and Ellen Weintraub, two Democratic FEC commissioners, said in a joint statement this month that the commission in 2019 voted only to move ahead with finding reason to believe that federal campaign finance laws were broken during the 2014 election cycle.

From First article… The Federal Election Commission let former President Donald Trump off the hook even after the body's legal counsel said he violated federal campaign finance laws with a fundraiser for Iowa veterans in 2016, according to documents made public this week. The documents on the link actually say the opposite of what the author says