Archy1221

Each one of these links simply state his allegations, which is that he's making claims in court that the Clinton Campaign spied on Trump. Those claims may be accurate, or they may be inaccurate. Correct, however, you said no one is taking it seriously. These news articles disagree with you. They take it seriously enough to spend resources covering it.

That’s fine by me. Maybe stop seeing Doctors that graduates from northwestern East New Mexico State medical school

As a general rule for everyone else, please don’t follow this advice.

You mean the one that ZERO convictions for the the actual issue it was tasked with investigating. Oh yeah, that one.

If nobody means just a person on the internet named Dr. Strangelove, then I guess you are on to something. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/594126-durham-alleges-cyber-analysts-exploited-access-to-trump-white-house?amp https://www.thedailybeast.com/igor-danchenko-steele-dossier-source-arrested-in-john-durham-investigation https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/11/04/durham-probe-analyst-tied-to-christopher-steele-trump-russia-dossier-arrested.html https://news.yahoo.com/amphtml/durham-tech-exec-working-clinton-145141701.html these are the left wing ones btw

Ohhhhh…….. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Durham n August 2009, Attorney General Eric Holderappointed Durham to lead the Justice Department's investigation of the legality of CIA's use of so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" in the torture of detainees.[24]

And another one

What does the Durham investigation have to do with Trump destroying documents? Those would be two separate issues in case you weren’t paying attention. You sound like another one of those ‘but let’s bring it back to something Trump did people’ no matter what Is being talked about.

It’s called significant other swapping now. Please try and keep up with the current language and stop being so offensive.

I’ve seen a few. They are quite wild

They did way more than look at social media. Surveying the coming and going’s of people at a private residence during a fundraiser as an example. I’ve gone through background checks for a job and I know what I’m getting into, and consent to it.

Are you seriously asking or just trying to be silly???

That’s very different

What do YOU think needs done to solve the inflation issue. I understand all the possibilities or tools.

How does inflation get solved?

What is causing it?

Looking into the background of the author There is a zero percent chance the writer knows more about QB play than myself. I played the position for 14 years and coached it another 7. You may want to know the background of someone before making those types of claims in the future I think an ESPN award does not mean a “Superstar” year on the field. Was he a Pro Bowl election? That would be a better indication of a good year than an “ESPY”. I don’t know which is why I’m asking. Take it however you wish. Saying he wasn’t a Superstar isn’t denigrating someone. It’s saying they didn’t have a Superstar year. He made it farther than I ever did, so he was much better than me, but not a playing Superstar in my opinion. Yours may differ which is fantastic. Nothing wrong with that. I don’t think I made that claim. I did say Blaine Gabbert is willing to be a backup QB in the league, which is with is still in the league and not CK.

I’m not out to denigrate CK, I’m responding to to an assertion by you that he was a superstar, which the numbers indicate he absolutely wasn’t (on the field) Lorewarn responded well to this Your using an article that quotes his own rep denying it. OK. What else do you expect him to say Doesn’t make him truthful. You mean the ones taking backup money? Like he could have. And that doesn’t actually make him a superstar QB though. It makes him liked by his teammates. He had 11/2 decent years and that’s about it.

No sorry, energy policy between Romney and Obama. My fault for not being specific.