Archy1221

Ohhhhh…….. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Durham n August 2009, Attorney General Eric Holderappointed Durham to lead the Justice Department's investigation of the legality of CIA's use of so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" in the torture of detainees.[24]

And another one

What does the Durham investigation have to do with Trump destroying documents? Those would be two separate issues in case you weren’t paying attention. You sound like another one of those ‘but let’s bring it back to something Trump did people’ no matter what Is being talked about.

It’s called significant other swapping now. Please try and keep up with the current language and stop being so offensive.

I’ve seen a few. They are quite wild

They did way more than look at social media. Surveying the coming and going’s of people at a private residence during a fundraiser as an example. I’ve gone through background checks for a job and I know what I’m getting into, and consent to it.

Are you seriously asking or just trying to be silly???

That’s very different

What do YOU think needs done to solve the inflation issue. I understand all the possibilities or tools.

How does inflation get solved?

What is causing it?

Looking into the background of the author There is a zero percent chance the writer knows more about QB play than myself. I played the position for 14 years and coached it another 7. You may want to know the background of someone before making those types of claims in the future I think an ESPN award does not mean a “Superstar” year on the field. Was he a Pro Bowl election? That would be a better indication of a good year than an “ESPY”. I don’t know which is why I’m asking. Take it however you wish. Saying he wasn’t a Superstar isn’t denigrating someone. It’s saying they didn’t have a Superstar year. He made it farther than I ever did, so he was much better than me, but not a playing Superstar in my opinion. Yours may differ which is fantastic. Nothing wrong with that. I don’t think I made that claim. I did say Blaine Gabbert is willing to be a backup QB in the league, which is with is still in the league and not CK.

I’m not out to denigrate CK, I’m responding to to an assertion by you that he was a superstar, which the numbers indicate he absolutely wasn’t (on the field) Lorewarn responded well to this Your using an article that quotes his own rep denying it. OK. What else do you expect him to say Doesn’t make him truthful. You mean the ones taking backup money? Like he could have. And that doesn’t actually make him a superstar QB though. It makes him liked by his teammates. He had 11/2 decent years and that’s about it.

No sorry, energy policy between Romney and Obama. My fault for not being specific.

A little revisionist history with that post. CK didn’t have a single season where he was in the top half in passing yardage, only had a single season where he was top half in QBR, a single season where he was I believe exactly middle of the pack in Rating. The rest of his seasons he was replacement player level at best. So no, he wasn’t a superstar because of play. He was a media made superstar. CK had ample opportunity to take backup money to re-establish himself if he got the chance to play. It’s what the guy you mention has done. The one that’s still in the league. CK chose not to do that because he makes more money doing the protest thing.

Energy policy? The economy and border wall is why Trump won. Hillary even campaigned on fixing a slow economy

I think we should start sending free bet coupons to all those in gamblers anonymous to help them so they don’t gamble their own money

Thanks for the answer. Romney over Obama for the same reasons I assume?

Yep, or when those of the Obama and Bush admin were caught doing the same.