I'm still in shock over that. Blatant fumble. Cunningham, unbelievably, starts in again with his "this is what we're trying to remove from the game" horsesh&*, meanwhile, we score a defensive touchdown. A flat out defensive touchdown. No review. (Of course we could only have gained possesion through a review and not the 6 points that we had, in fact, earned, but possession nonetheless.)
And no mention of fumble by either broadcaster.
Un....real. Oh well. They still couldn't take it from us, could they? GBR!!!!!!
The broadcasters mentioned that it looked like fumble and it was not reviewed b/c the play was blown dead on the field. You cannot call a fumble on a review just like you can't call a face-mask.
How is a play blown dead before or during a QB sack????
It was blown dead (maybe "dead" is not the right word, it was whistled that the play was over) after the sack. They didn't call the fumble on the field so you can't call it on review.
Yea after the sack the play is over, but the fumble came while he was still going down.
There is no explanation that is valid to uphold your opinion or the Texass football conference referees or both officials. That was a fumble. But it doesn't really matter now