This guy is a moron.
As has previously been mentioned, Shawn Watson has been a "candidate" for virtually every coaching job that has come available within the last 2.5 months. In addition, Charles Jackson's dad has already publicly stated that his son's decision wouldn't have been influenced by the staff changes had they been announced before NSD. Furthermore, he admonished reporters who, like this jackass, blew that issue out of proportion in order to sell media.
What exactly were Jackson's options? He had signed on the line. There was no way to back out. Of course he is going to say "oh yeah! Everything is fine!" Interesting how that conflicts with his initial reaction, isn't it? Perhaps it wasn't obvious enough for you.
I'm not willing to give Chatelain the benefit of the doubt as far as how that interview was conducted. I really don't think we have enough information to go around calling Bo's integrity into question.
Ah. Bo's integrity is beyond reproach but we must all assume that Chatelain is untrustworthy. That's awfully convenient.
I'm not going to argue with you about Chatelain. Just consider the following:
We don't know what questions Charles Jackson was asked.
We don't know when the Marvin Sanders situation came to a head. Hell, we don't even know what the Marvin Sanders situation is.
We don't know what Bo's legal obligations are when it comes to publicizing this kind of information (at least I don't).
I think you should know the answers to those questions before you draw the types of conclusions that you are drawing.
And I think it's even more ridiculous to criticize Pelini for not "disclosing" the fact that Shawn Watson was leaving. After 10 weeks of speculation about his status with the team (partly because of his inept performance, partly because he was actively interviewing with other schools), you can't possibly criticize Pelini for the way he handled Watson.
Eh. I guess I trust Chatelain's journalistic integrity. He's one of the few Nebraska writers willing to ask questions about what we want to know versus what the University wants us to know. That's a healthy thing.
I don't have a problem with firing coaches. Heck, I've been calling for the firing of Watson for as long as anyone on this board. My problem is that recruits apparently signed with Nebraska without being informed that their position coaches would not be here. I do not think that is fair to them, in fact I think it reeks of dishonesty and a lack of integrity. If my son had signed with Nebraska to be coached specifically by Marvin Sanders, and the coaches hid the fact that he would not be here until after he signed his LOI, I would be disgusted.
Maybe I just expect a higher standard of conduct.
But Charles' dad, on the other hand, didn't even take issue with it...