Moiraine

IIRC Riley recruited Stanton pretty hard when he was at Oregon State. Perhaps he figured he had his QB of the future already on the roster thus didn't need to go after a new QB? That is true, but if you have a philosophy of recruiting a QB every year, why did Riley not recruit one in 2015? I doubt he didn't try but he didn't have a lot of time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5EDm4zfZVM Saw this on FB feed so I found it on Youtube. It epitomizes Trump's relationship with facts.

Nope just fixing the errors of the committee. Good job miss st. Ya... I meant ruin everything by letting Texas A&M come back. But they won in the end.

Get out.

What do you expect them to do? That isn't even sh#t talking.

Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Go cheer for Washington. They're good this year.

It might be too early to come to this conclusion, but I think we need to get a new defensive coordinator if we're going to win any type of championships.

Agreed. Also, nobody better do anything to harm Trump. It'd piss me off to no end if that happened, for lots of reasons. One, he's a human. Two, I want him to lose the election fair and square.

Need a big play here or have them punt it from their side of the field. Can't have them score again now.

That was a drop by Morgan. Went right through his hands THEN the OSU player touched it.

I swear some people will whine about anything. We just threw a pick 6, and drove the ball 70 yards up the field on them for a score, showing that we could move it on them. That's a great turn of events. We could've folded instead.

I don't think that was Armstrong's fault. Have we ever run it on 3rd and 3 or 3rd and 4 this season? It really doesn't seem like it.

Some people were asking after you recently. They missed you.

Mike Gundy has a mullet now

Love the first reply:

Something tells me 7.3 isn't good.... I bet it's 7.3/8

Here's a nice graphic from 270towin.com showing a bunch of different predicted electoral college tallies including 538.

I think it's more likely that Trump exceeds that electoral vote total than Hillary but I see this as the most plausible outcome based on what I've seen from the polls and early voting. I was reading the link someone posted in the general election topic about Nevada and I'd probably flip that one to blue if I made the map again.

You know, maybe i'm in the minority, but I would be fine with one absolutely awful (even worse than 2015 season) every decade or so if it meant we were otherwise making the playoffs, winning conference championships and major bowls. I agree with this but we'll see how they are long term now without their defensive coordinator.

They'd be 2-7. Worse than the 2015 Nebraska team.

How is it "really interesting" ? Gerrymandering is awful. It disenfranchises voters, particularly minorities. Do you really want the Republicans to win every time, even when they lose the popular vote? Does that seem very Democratic to you? The electoral college has gotten it wrong before (2000) but that's extremely rare. Using congressional districts, it would be wrong a lot more often because of gerrymandering. Now if they made MUCH stricter laws about gerrymandering, (e.g. - a district must have 6 sides max unless it borders a body of water) it could be an option. But that would never happen. Considering most people have to look up what gerrymandering is, I think its interesting. If you don't fine but don't degrade my opinion to say its interesting cause others may enjoy to read it. It is not a great argument to say its not interesting when I intended it for everyone to see, if you don't like it that's your opinion and I respect that, but I know others may find it interesting. I argued with you. That's going to happen here and is within the rules. You can tell people not to argue/disagree with you if you want but you're just going to come off as being thin-skinned. I know that and in the bold I stated I respect your opinion. I guess if you want to judge me and call me "thin-skinned" go ahead, but it doesn't even add to this discussion. I never even said you can't argue with me, are you letting your emotions get in the way maybe? Regardless of that I made a claim, you disagreed with it, you don't have to tell me the rules I know them very well and I know many people think differently then me. I wanted to give people an interesting fact for them to have, that was my main message regardless of what others say. You're doing it again. Still not sure how my original response got the weird reaction you had to it. It was pretty damn harmless as far as arguments here are concerned. Also, asking how it was interesting wasn't a rhetorical question. I thought maybe you'd explain it instead of getting offended.

Now Mississippi State trying to ruin everything. 28-21.

How is it "really interesting" ? Gerrymandering is awful. It disenfranchises voters, particularly minorities. Do you really want the Republicans to win every time, even when they lose the popular vote? Does that seem very Democratic to you? The electoral college has gotten it wrong before (2000) but that's extremely rare. Using congressional districts, it would be wrong a lot more often because of gerrymandering. Now if they made MUCH stricter laws about gerrymandering, (e.g. - a district must have 6 sides max unless it borders a body of water) it could be an option. But that would never happen. Considering most people have to look up what gerrymandering is, I think its interesting. If you don't fine but don't degrade my opinion to say its interesting cause others may enjoy to read it. It is not a great argument to say its not interesting when I intended it for everyone to see, if you don't like it that's your opinion and I respect that, but I know others may find it interesting. I argued with you. That's going to happen here and is within the rules. You can tell people not to argue/disagree with you if you want but you're just going to come off as being thin-skinned.

4th quarter, NW had ball in the red zone down 13-7 and fumbled it.

Really hoping the Aggies lose. They should not be #4. 28-14 in 4th quarter.