Moiraine

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted! To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her? Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it. My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that. lol, show me what line you consider "criticizing her", because the way I read it, you were making excuses because your mom is a successful business woman, who is about the same age as Hillary and she doesn't know anything about computers or technology, either... see the correlation? That statement pretty much fits, from what I have seen, your stance on Hillary... and your stance on Trump. If I remember correctly, you complained about me being abrasive with my early posts, so why the first line? Don't you follow your own advice, or are you a do as I say, not as I do person? Again, please read what I posted How do you come away from THIS line, which was the entire point of my post, not understanding that I was criticizing her and thinking I was making an excuse??? How do you not understand it's criticism??? I said Clinton has a huge ego. I said she ignored the experts who understand something she's ignorant on. It's so confusing to me that you took it as anything but criticism that I had no other option than to make the reading comprehension comment. And again with my mom, I'm saying she knows she doesn't know about computers but she would listen to the people who do know about them. But Clinton has a big ego and didn't listen. The whole point of the comparison is that lots of old people are totally ignorant on computers/internet so it's likely Clinton is too but it doesn't mean she's not capable of doing the job... As long as she doesn't ignore people like she did about the emails. I'M SAYING IT WAS STUPID. Why am I trying to explain this for a third time? Do I have to use fantastical words line "Clinton's such a dumb dumb like all those other libs for not listening to people who know what they're doing?" I just don't get it. Let me try a 4th time. Clinton probably ignored advice on internet security because she's an idiot who didn't think their advice was necessary. This is what I was saying in the original post, and the 2nd post, and the first part of this third post. Well, I stepped in pretty good. I don't know how the hell I skimmed over that, pretty important line.. twice! I would try to blame it on all the games, but that doesn't explain my post a little bit ago.. geez, maybe I should be more careful reading "everything". My fault and my apologizes! No worries. And I'm sorry for the "dumb dumb... libs" comment but I was going crazy, heh.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted! To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her? Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it. My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that. lol, show me what line you consider "criticizing her", because the way I read it, you were making excuses because your mom is a successful business woman, who is about the same age as Hillary and she doesn't know anything about computers or technology, either... see the correlation? That statement pretty much fits, from what I have seen, your stance on Hillary... and your stance on Trump. If I remember correctly, you complained about me being abrasive with my early posts, so why the first line? Don't you follow your own advice, or are you a do as I say, not as I do person? Again, please read what I posted How do you come away from THIS line, which was the entire point of my post, not understanding that I was criticizing her and thinking I was making an excuse??? How do you not understand it's criticism??? I said Clinton has a huge ego. I said she ignored the experts who understand something she's ignorant on. It's so confusing to me that you took it as anything but criticism that I had no other option than to make the reading comprehension comment. And again with my mom, I'm saying she knows she doesn't know about computers but she would listen to the people who do know about them. But Clinton has a big ego and didn't listen. The whole point of the comparison is that lots of old people are totally ignorant on computers/internet so it's likely Clinton is too but it doesn't mean she's not capable of doing the job... As long as she doesn't ignore people like she did about the emails. I'M SAYING IT WAS STUPID. Why am I trying to explain this for a third time? Do I have to use fantastical words line "Clinton's such a dumb dumb like all those other libs for not listening to people who know what they're doing?" I just don't get it. Let me try a 4th time. Clinton probably ignored advice on internet security because she's an idiot who didn't think their advice was necessary. This is what I was saying in the original post, and the 2nd post, and the first part of this third post.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted! To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her? Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it. My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that. The difference is that Hillary is mandated to take training on the classifications of info on a yearly basis just like the rest of us government employees do. We also get training on how to use every program that is needed to do our job. All of the excuses she is using is bogus, especially for someone who has worked in Government for 20-30 years. I believe that is the difference between Hillary and your mother. I would also watch the "reading comprehension" comment because if you remember I was banned for a month for using the same comment. Maybe it won't matter since you favor the left as most of the mods do on here, but I don't want you to get banned for something as silly as I did with no warning. I also wanted to thank you for standing up for me when I was banned. I really appreciated it as it goes to show that even though we may disagree on some topics on here, it shouldn't be personal. First paragraph is sort of related to what I said about Clinton not listening/caring what the people who know about it are saying.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted! To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her? Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it. My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that.

Too young

Are you aware that we're fans? We can look past every team and onto the playoffs if we so decide and it will have no effect on the outcome of the Wyoming game.

I think we'll be ranked after the Wyoming game if it's a blowout.

After last year? Ain't over 'til it's over.

WOO HOO BLACKSHIRTS (?)

I realize my posts talked about regulations, that was my fault, I should have said excessive regulations, those are hurting the economy.. like the EPA regulations regarding man made climate change, which is why VW is in the mess the are in. TDI's before 2009 are ok to drive, but all of a sudden after 2008, regulations made it so that car manufacturers had to cheat. it isn't just Volkswagen. They did not have to cheat. Their engineers elected to cheat. Plenty of other manufacturers did not do this. Further more these regulations level the playing field. If they are forced to meet the same regs no one can neglect health and safety to boost the bottom line over a competitor. You really think the indusrty would move to cleaner more efficient cars if the government didn't pushed them to? Sure they would if the buying public forced them. Government isn't the answer to everything, shocker for some, I know. Capitalism has always done a good job of pushing companies to change... Without government control! EDIT: Like I said before, I know all about the situation.. I have two of those cars. Really? What do you call companies who are doing somehing that causes cancer, know about it, and continue to donit until they're caught. Did they stop causing cancer due to healthy competition or because they were caught?

So you're just going to ignore the others' completely valid points after you throw your two completely incorrect cents out there. Neat. From now on whenever I'm arguing about something that a topic was specifically meant for, I'm just gonna use the "starving in China" line.

He shouldn't be able to play the next game. Maybe not the game after that, either.

Texas A&M losing now. (edit: nm, I looked at scoreboard wrong and it's a tie) I almost always cheer for unranked teams but the SEC is the exception. Still mad TN won.

WOO HOO. Now don't do anything dumb please Wisconsin.

USC vs Alabama and Notre Dame vs Texas. Is it possible for all 4 teams to lose??

Trying this out in a couple weeks. It's available on Roku now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtGEd9nP0bs

I don't think you read the previous posts.

Totally!!!!

GREAT POST

NO THEY DON'T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111ONEONEONE. THEY HURT CAPITALISM. THEY HURTS OUR ECONOMY! FREE MARKET. NO LIMITS. FREEDOM. USA! USA! USA!

There's nothing at all wrong with them having an opinion or speaking out about it. They should. I'm only talking about the actual action they're suggesting if it happens. I felt "meh, don't care" about the not standing for the anthem thing, but the socks show he's an idiot.

I don't get the point they're trying to make by saying "Big game Bob." If they have an 80% chance to win, then it's not a big game. They're supposed to roll them over. Losing a game they're supposed to win doesn't show that he's not "big game Bob." It shows that he's good at flopping in games he should win.

Joe Paterno a child molester? proof? accusations? "we all know these creeps "hunt in packs", what does that even mean? sounds like a medieval witch hunt quote. No we all dont know that, in fact thats a false statement as most pedos seem to act alone, it is pretty damn shameful after all. Paterno reported what happened and could have done more, really it was schools responsibility once he reported it. But let's not go full drama queen with nonsensical hyperbole. Paterno not doing more is an understatement.And those defending him like he did his part to solve the situation,are as discusting as he was. No drama gueen,just fact. Paterno was a coach, it was not he's job to handle that, he reported it and likely considered it handled. It was up to the administration to deal with criminal issues not "detective" Paterno. The man was also from a generation where things like that "didnt exist" so he was an unlikely expert how to even respond to something like that, other then doing what he did, reporting it. And yea calling him a molester is going full drama queen as there is no proof or even accusation of such. Calling Penn State Pedo Uni is in the same realm of drama queen, though I get it's just some peoples dislike for the school and they juice one bad thing for all they can. In the end a few individuals were involved and the school is full of teachers and students who are like any other Americans. Are you up to date with your knowledge on this or are you chiming in with 4-5 year old news? Because it sounds like the latter.

A lot of times when I read about Clinton and the email stuff I remember she's about the same age as my mom. My mom runs a successful business and she knows nothing about computers or technology. The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff. And before the "so why vote for her" people chime in, Trump would be even worse in my opinion. I can't imagine him having anyone but Yes Men around him.