kramer Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Why not throw Ganz or Beck in the game in the fourth just to see what happens? Quote Link to comment
DJR313 Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Why not throw Ganz or Beck in the game in the fourth just to see what happens? Why not let Taylor play the entire game so he could get some sort of rhythm going? Quote Link to comment
IrishAZ Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 How far behind Taylor is Beck, anyway? I mean, is he capable of running the entire package Taylor has, or is he limited in the plays available? Seems that if he's far behind, he'll need to compensate somehow in the event Zack goes down and some reps would do him, and the team as a whole, good. If he's close, then the reps would probably be more disruptive of Taylor's progress than beneficial to the team as a whole. I suspect if Taylor has a good game to the point the coaches are confident he's "got it", the second teamers will get game reps. Until then, let him get more experience, even if in garbage time, so he can be playing at a higher level during the more strenuous part of the schedule. IRISH! GBR! Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 agree, i think it is obvious Zac needs to keep playing and get a series og full games under his belt......i do not see Beck or Ganz coming into playunless Taylor gets hurt.....remember, Taylor has still to play a full game against D1A competition, so he has ALOT to learn........ hunter Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 agree, i think it is obvious Zac needs to keep playing and get a series og full games under his belt......i do not see Beck or Ganz coming into playunless Taylor gets hurt.....remember, Taylor has still to play a full game against D1A competition, so he has ALOT to learn........ hunter Agreed. Quote Link to comment
Steve Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I say we should have put in Beck. Late in the game it seemed Taylor was flustered. He needed a break. The game wasn't on the line and leaving Taylor in can only result in more mistakes. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 but steve, i think the point here is, you leave Taylor in and let him "work thru it"..he is going to have ups and downs in games that he will need to play the whole game, it is part of the learning process and developing mental toughness...... hunter Quote Link to comment
DJR313 Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I say we should have put in Beck. Late in the game it seemed Taylor was flustered. He needed a break. The game wasn't on the line and leaving Taylor in can only result in more mistakes. 15-7 = Game still on the line. Taylor was named starting quarterback, he apparently has earned it with his hard work and he had a rough night. He needs to learn to work through the tough ones, like Hunter just said. Quote Link to comment
Wharf Rat Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I say we should have put in Beck. Late in the game it seemed Taylor was flustered. He needed a break. The game wasn't on the line and leaving Taylor in can only result in more mistakes. Why would you put in the 3rd team QB and bypass the 2nd? The game was "on the line" until we scored with 4:43 left in the game giving us more than a 2 possession lead. After that, we only had one more possession and it was a pretty steady diet of Lucky left, Lucky right. So let me get this straight, with a one possession lead you want to pull your starting QB, put in the 3rd string QB that has been in the system all of 4 weeks and has 0 game experience. Ya, great way to break in a QB. What do you tell Ganz? Sorry, your our 2nd team QB but that doesn't mean anything because you won't play? Sounds like a brilliant coaching philosophy to me. Quote Link to comment
TheKiD Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 No way they should've put anybody else in at QB on sat. When we're up 21 or more going into the 4th.. then start putting the backups. But, it's much mroe important right now to get our starter comfortable out there, and in synch with the recievers. But with BC rotating so many players in and out, plus the cramps and such.. I don't know how we expect get our offense in synch. Let's hope we've figured out who we want in there, and let them play. Quote Link to comment
Touchdown Tommie Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Give the kid some consistentcy and let him figure it out against sub-par teams. He needs to get the feel of working through rough times at the D1-A level. He will start to see things after this of film and a game under his belt. Quote Link to comment
Bakhal Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 So let me get this straight, with a one possession lead you want to pull your starting QB, put in the 3rd string QB that has been in the system all of 4 weeks and has 0 game experience. Ya, great way to break in a QB. What do you tell Ganz? Sorry, your our 2nd team QB but that doesn't mean anything because you won't play? Sounds like a brilliant coaching philosophy to me Good one wharf I agree!! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.