Husker_x Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Also realize this stalemate is partly (or even largely) fueled by the election in five months. Link to comment
carlfense Posted July 10, 2012 Author Share Posted July 10, 2012 ***SNIP***Kudos to Mitt Romney for providing the model for Obamacare. Perfect, it's not. Better than the status quo? Yeah. Absolutely. 1 Link to comment
Yossarian Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 ***SNIP***Kudos to Mitt Romney for providing the model for Obamacare. Perfect, it's not. Better than the status quo? Yeah. Absolutely. I like the way leftists applaud Romneycare but ridicule Mitt for wearing the funny underwear. I think he and Deval Patrick are both wrong. BTW, does Romneycare pay for porn, tattoos, and bail? Link to comment
knapplc Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 I like the way leftists applaud Romneycare but ridicule Mitt for wearing the funny underwear. The two are not connected, methinks. Link to comment
Yossarian Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 I like the way leftists applaud Romneycare but ridicule Mitt for wearing the funny underwear. The two are not connected, methinks. I agree, but the same people who ridicule his Mormomism love the fact that he is the father of Romneycare. Link to comment
knapplc Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 I like the way leftists applaud Romneycare but ridicule Mitt for wearing the funny underwear. The two are not connected, methinks. I agree, but the same people who ridicule his Mormomism love the fact that he is the father of Romneycare. Using the broadest of brushes. Link to comment
carlfense Posted July 10, 2012 Author Share Posted July 10, 2012 I like the way leftists applaud Romneycare but ridicule Mitt for wearing the funny underwear. The two are not connected, methinks. I agree, but the same people who ridicule his Mormomism love the fact that he is the father of Romneycare. Which shows . . . what . . . exactly? Link to comment
Yossarian Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 I like the way leftists applaud Romneycare but ridicule Mitt for wearing the funny underwear. The two are not connected, methinks. I agree, but the same people who ridicule his Mormomism love the fact that he is the father of Romneycare. Which shows . . . what . . . exactly? Uh...it shows that they are INCONSISTENT! Link to comment
carlfense Posted July 10, 2012 Author Share Posted July 10, 2012 I like the way leftists applaud Romneycare but ridicule Mitt for wearing the funny underwear. The two are not connected, methinks. I agree, but the same people who ridicule his Mormomism love the fact that he is the father of Romneycare. Which shows . . . what . . . exactly? Uh...it shows that they are INCONSISTENT! How so? 1 Link to comment
carlfense Posted July 10, 2012 Author Share Posted July 10, 2012 Yos, you're the one asserting that those are inconsistent. Therefore, you have the burden of explaining why they are inconsistent. I won't be baited into making your argument for you. Link to comment
Yossarian Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Yos, you're the one asserting that those are inconsistent. Therefore, you have the burden of explaining why they are inconsistent. I won't be baited into making your argument for you. You're pretending to be confused and stupid again...right? I believe that if you love Romney for Obamacare, you shouldn't care about his wearing funny underwear. That's all the time I can spend on explaining the inconsistentcy. I'm not getting paid to do this. 1 Link to comment
strigori Posted July 10, 2012 Share Posted July 10, 2012 Yos, you're the one asserting that those are inconsistent. Therefore, you have the burden of explaining why they are inconsistent. I won't be baited into making your argument for you. You're pretending to be confused and stupid again...right? I believe that if you love Romney for Obamacare, you shouldn't care about his wearing funny underwear. That's all the time I can spend on explaining the inconsistentcy. I'm not getting paid to do this. So if you love apples you need to love oranges? 2 Link to comment
Enhance Posted July 11, 2012 Share Posted July 11, 2012 I'm a little late to the party - to be honest, health care doesn't directly affect me and I won't be paying for my own health care until next year at the earliest. But, from what I've read and seen about Obamacare, I just can't see how it is a good plan for the extended future. Two thirds of doctors are considering cutting government funded insurance programs because costs are too high and reimbursement too low. New taxes and regulations will force companies to spend more money, resulting in job loss. The list goes on. Sure, people who can't afford health insurance will get it. I've also read on USA Today that the program will force 18 million people to go onto Medicaid, but that millions will remain uninsured. It reasons that our overall healthcare quality will suffer, no? Now, correct me if I'm wrong while I'm working this out. People with private insurance who won't be directly paying a tax to support public health care are still going to be indirectly paying because the government will be leaching from other tax revenues. Yes? Link to comment
knapplc Posted July 11, 2012 Share Posted July 11, 2012 to be honest, health care doesn't directly affect me Sadly, yes, it does. You may not know it, but it does. Speaking as a guy who nearly lost his wife to cancer and did lose his mother to cancer, you do not know that it won't affect you. Both cancers came from out of the blue. Both were severe, affecting what appeared to be very healthy ladies. You simply do not know. Don't take it for granted, man. It really, really affects you. 3 Link to comment
Recommended Posts