Jump to content


Offense


Recommended Posts

The West Coast Offense, like pretty much any offense these days, is more about a philosophy of attacking the defense. Its primarily seen as a 'dink and dunk' or 'Nicole and dime' kind of offense, mostly short quick passes, screens, bubbles, slants, in and out routes, but also some smash and levels concepts, all focused on stretching the defense horizontally. Its where the term 'spread' originally came from, because it spreads the defensive secondaries out, which opens holes in zone coverage, and the sharp cuts in the pass routes allow receivers to get open against man.

 

Now, something that everyone needs to understand is that literally EVERY offense has run some elements of the WCO since 1990. Yes, even Tom Osborne ran some of the same pass patterns. Because it was so effective against the defenses of the time. The pure WCO still works, but less so than it used to because defenses have adjusted to counter it. 409 had a scheme that was murder to the pure WCO.

 

Now, the high flying offenses of Baylor, Oregon, tOSU, Auburn and so many others use elements of the WCO to spread defenses horizontally, and elements of the Air Coryell system to stretch them vertically, all in the same play. The blending of the two combined with a zone running offense and some read option and some speed option have become the current trend in high octane offenses, and its very effective because defenses have to literally account for everything every play. From sideline to sideline and from the LOS to the end zone has to be accounted for.

 

 

Now that your understand that, think about this: HCMR has run elements of all of this (save for zone read and other option attacks) all through his college career. He has run deep attack systems when he had a QB with a strong arm. He has run a zone based running attack when he had a shifty RB. He has run a dink and dunk WCO when he had a quick, accurate passer (most recently, Sean Mannion) He can combine wrinkles like jet sweeps, middle screens, bubble screens, tunnel screens, and play action passes as needed to counter whatever a defense is doing. All he needs to do it is blend in some read option (which, according to some early interviews and what I saw in the spring game makes me think he already has) and we have the potential for an offense that will look more like a spread option attack like Oregon, like Ohio State, like Baylor and Auburns and so on. While Tommy needs more polishing on his short routes for certain, this new staff will build him up and adjust the playbook to what Tommy does best. We have the RBs to run zone well, we have DPE and others on jet sweeps, we have Carter for pass routes both short and long, we have other TEs and FBs for blocking and short yardage packages... This year, I believe, is shaping up to be something special, with the only worry I have being the OL due to inexperience. All the pieces are there. The staff and players just have to put it together, crank the ignition, and roar to an 11-1 regular season.

  • Fire 2
Link to comment

I still remember people whining about Shawn Watson's deals.

I suspect that, much like BC, it will take a good while to install. I remember a whole lot of rushing in that first year because Joe Dailey was a dual threat option guy and his passes were inconsistent, to say the least.

Here's to history not repeating itself!

Really???

 

In 2003, we attempted 192 passes and completed 94. (48.9%)

 

In 2004 (BCs first year) we attempted 322 passes and completed 156. (48.5%)

 

In the ISU game against the worst rushing defense in the conference, we lost after attempting 43 passes and only completing 19. (44%)

Link to comment

I guess we'll find out for sure. The only way to turn me off from this staff is to run the WCO. I would just for once in my lifetime like to enjoy a Husker team that runs both defense and offense to what I like to watch.

 

Auburn/Oregon/Ohio State offense that starts with a heavy RUN game first, with an attacking 4-3 Defense.

 

I'm not trying to be fair weather or whatever, and if the chains are moving consistently thats fine, but doesn't mean I have to like it. I absolutely abhor the Pro Style/WCO.

 

I hate being under center unless its for Flexbone purpose only.

Link to comment

I think our weakest offensive positions are offensive tackle and quarterback. We're going to have to run. One reason the deep ball needs so much work is that Armstrong doesn't have the line to give him the time to wait for the deep ball. The pocket collapses too quickly. This offense this season will have the most success off the screen, sweep, play action pass, zone read, and running plays.

 

LOL.. Well that just about sums up what every team in college football could say about them selves

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...