cm husker Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 So basically, you used quotation marks around a narrative you invented out of thin air. Sounds par for the course, as long as it results in scapegoating a player. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 I'm going to defer to Mavric on the running point, because he's posted the facts over and over. I don't feel like repeating them again. Maybe he'll send you a link. What's that? Stats? Do they break down certain situational instances. Do they break down intangible concepts like the idea of having playmakers at WR that you'd like to get the ball too? The urgency of competing with a porous defense at times? Not having a consistent idea of your identity at RB? These are all issues of a first year. yeah, get me them numbers. I'll continue to watch the games and trust my eyes. I'm not debating with Mav. He does good sh#t. But stats only tell a small slice of the story. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 So basically, you used quotation marks around a narrative you invented out of thin air. Sounds par for the course, as long as it results in scapegoating a player. yes I did. in a sarcastic manner to display how god damn open the guy was and how my 8 yr old son recognized how open he was on the snap of the ball in live play on tv. One of the most disgusting displays of qb play ive ever witnessed. Boy you really took a big jump at the obvious there, eh? 2 Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 LOL. Scapegoating a player? well duh. Coaches coach Players play. This instance falls perfectly in line with this line of thought. Sorry you cant see it that way. Quote Link to comment
cm husker Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 I'm going to defer to Mavric on the running point, because he's posted the facts over and over. I don't feel like repeating them again. Maybe he'll send you a link. What's that? Stats? Do they break down certain situational instances. Do they break down intangible concepts like the idea of having playmakers at WR that you'd like to get the ball too? The urgency of competing with a porous defense at times? Not having a consistent idea of your identity at RB? These are all issues of a first year. yeah, get me them numbers. I'll continue to watch the games and trust my eyes. I'm not debating with Mav. He does good sh#t. But stats only tell a small slice of the story. Yeah, he broke them down in detail. Mainly focused on evidence of early abandonment and unimaginative schemes for the RBs. And you don't sooth a pourous defense by having a QB fling it around who many according to many around here is at best ill fitted and at worst awful. Quote Link to comment
cm husker Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 So basically, you used quotation marks around a narrative you invented out of thin air. Sounds par for the course, as long as it results in scapegoating a player. yes I did. in a sarcastic manner to display how god damn open the guy was and how my 8 yr old son recognized how open he was on the snap of the ball in live play on tv. One of the most disgusting displays of qb play ive ever witnessed. Boy you really took a big jump at the obvious there, eh? It's ok, and I get that you don't understand some fundamentals here, but when a QB has a progression, he works that progression. He doesn't freelance. If a guy is open based on the read rules, he makes the throw. It's freelancing that gets him hitched at by fans around here. Imagine the alternative for a moment. Tommy doesn't make the read and instead tries to guess what is open. Instead of cethan actually being open, someone jumps the route and bats it down or takes it the other way. Then people are freaking out that he didn't go to his first and proper read. Or are you saying he should have reverse read the progression? Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 youre right. I dont understand fundamentals. got it. this just turned funny. So basically, you used quotation marks around a narrative you invented out of thin air. Sounds par for the course, as long as it results in scapegoating a player. yes I did. in a sarcastic manner to display how god damn open the guy was and how my 8 yr old son recognized how open he was on the snap of the ball in live play on tv. One of the most disgusting displays of qb play ive ever witnessed. Boy you really took a big jump at the obvious there, eh? It's ok, and I get that you don't understand some fundamentals here, but when a QB has a progression, he works that progression. He doesn't freelance. If a guy is open based on the read rules, he makes the throw. It's freelancing that gets him hitched at by fans around here.Imagine the alternative for a moment. Tommy doesn't make the read and instead tries to guess what is open. Instead of cethan actually being open, someone jumps the route and bats it down or takes it the other way. Then people are freaking out that he didn't go to his first and proper read.Or are you saying he should have reverse read the progression? right. the fade was open. Cethan wasnt. you got me. Quote Link to comment
cm husker Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 The fade was the "right" read on that play against that coverage. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 The fade was the "right" read on that play against that coverage. ok. got it. Quote Link to comment
cm husker Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 Good. Glad I could provide you some insight. I'm impressed you are willing to change your view. Most people can't. Well done. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 Good. Glad I could provide you some insight. I'm impressed you are willing to change your view. Most people can't. Well done. likewise 1 Quote Link to comment
Stumpy1 Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 So basically, you used quotation marks around a narrative you invented out of thin air. Sounds par for the course, as long as it results in scapegoating a player. yes I did. in a sarcastic manner to display how god damn open the guy was and how my 8 yr old son recognized how open he was on the snap of the ball in live play on tv. One of the most disgusting displays of qb play ive ever witnessed. Boy you really took a big jump at the obvious there, eh? It's ok, and I get that you don't understand some fundamentals here, but when a QB has a progression, he works that progression. He doesn't freelance. If a guy is open based on the read rules, he makes the throw. It's freelancing that gets him hitched at by fans around here. Imagine the alternative for a moment. Tommy doesn't make the read and instead tries to guess what is open. Instead of cethan actually being open, someone jumps the route and bats it down or takes it the other way. Then people are freaking out that he didn't go to his first and proper read. Or are you saying he should have reverse read the progression? So...You are saying he doesn't freelance but his freelancing is what gets fans all worked up over him. That makes a whole hell of a lot of sense. 2 Quote Link to comment
cm husker Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 To those who are able to understand the English language, it certainly does. Glad you apparently can and are pointing out the sense. Quote Link to comment
desertshox Posted August 23, 2016 Share Posted August 23, 2016 wtf did i just read? 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.