Jump to content


FrankWheeler

Members
  • Posts

    1,175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FrankWheeler

  1. They have because it was a normal thing to do before McConnell wouldn't allow it in 2016.
  2. This also makes it pretty clear that the deadline is May 29th until the NBA and NBPA changes their rules. https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/enforcement/2019ENF_NBAMemo.pdf Pg. 13 #3 - A student-athlete who wishes to remove his name from the NBA Draft AND maintain NCAA eligibility must submit a written statement to the NBA by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time, May 29, 2019.
  3. Based on what I can find this isn't true yet. https://www.ncaa.org/about/flexibility-going-pro-and-getting-degree NBA draft flexibility College basketball players who request an Undergraduate Advisory Committee evaluation, participate in the NBA combine and aren’t drafted can return to school as long as they notify their athletics director of their intent by 5 p.m. the Monday after the draft. This change is effective if/when the NBA and NBPA make an expected rule change, which would make undrafted student-athletes who return to college after the draft ineligible for the NBA until the end of the next college basketball season.
  4. Can you link to where the rules changed last year?
  5. But also some people are racist white supremacists?
  6. Not only included in the census, but shouldn't the parents get tax credits for them as well?
  7. But why would the size of the platform make any difference in whether they can remove certain users for violating the terms of service? Where is the cutoff from when the platform gets to 'that size'?
  8. What if a billionaire bought up facebook and shut it down and killed public discourse for-EVER!
  9. Glad that's all done. This is how I talk to my children when they argue with each other and I have to try and mediate.
  10. That was quite the cliffhanger at the end. Barr challenges the calling of Mueller a career prosecutor, says his letter was a bit snitty and probably not written by him, and then says "No" to being able to see the notes of their phone call. I can't wait for the next episode!
  11. "What information was shared?" "Who did they share it with?"
  12. With Barr's responses to these questions I don't think he has read the report either.
  13. These hearings are terrible. The time limits and shifting of focus and questioning between the parties is maddening.
  14. This happened with Jon Snow as well, he was completely surrounded and then - no problems at all.
  15. Insane shot, but how this isn't a travel is odd.
  16. Reading thru the game threads I thought the team was in last place.
  17. Twitter is freaking me out right now. Joe Walsh and Glen Greenwald crossing sides is so odd.
  18. This is also the moment when Rosenstein breaks character and cracks a smile.
  19. Barr essentially just said, "Yes, Trump was debatably obstructing justice because he was stessed out and angry over the investigation"
  20. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/03/26/trump_the_mueller_report_was_great_it_could_not_have_been_better.html
  21. Glad I am not the only one that was watching this. Jurgens' snaps definitely looked shaky, especially late in the 2nd quarter. Forbes looked better in my opinion . Farniok looked really sharp with his snaps.
  22. Looks like he was a 2017 high school graduate so he's a 3 for 2.
×
×
  • Create New...