BigRedBuster

Yeah...he's been busy tweeting these.

I'm glad you posted this because I have thought the exact same thing. These people are showing MUCH more disrespect than the three kneeling players.

I'm pumped for this game. I was surprised this thread had fallen as far down as it had. Each game we win, the team gains more confidence and gets stronger. This is another team that beat us last year and now it's time to let them know their proper place.

It's truly one of those things that people will be reading books about and learning about 100 years from now. They are going to be saying..."What the F*** were those people thinking back then?"

I've read that a few different places. Sorry, that's total BS.

See???? It's rigged just like Trump said it would be.

FIFY Fair enough - most people, when they actually dig into the issues that she has lied on see that the weight of them vs. the attention they are getting is a wee bit skewed ... vs the gaps of supporting information and outright lies that come from the other one. But you're right. She has lied. Not sure if anyone saw John Oliver this weekend, but he (I'm paraphrasing here) said lies to politicians are like raisins in a cookie. You don't like them, they shouldn't be there, but they are. You hope your cookie has no raisins. Hillary's cookie has some raisins, but Trump has only raisins .. no cookie whatsoever. Quite frankly, I view her lies as big lies while Trump lies constantly. The issue is that the only reason why Trumps aren't as big of lies as hers is because he hasn't been in public life like she has. IF (God help us) he wins, we will have some real whopper of lies over the next 4 years that will potentially dwarf anything she has said.

I'm confused on the two options.

That's pretty sweet. BTW...Niles....You need to tie your shoes. You are going to trip and hurt yourself.

I think this is a success story for Coach Williams. Moore always appeared to me to have the athleticism but he wasn't a good WR. Williams has made him into a good WR that has the speed to get down field behind defenses. The combination of Moore, Westy and Reilly on the field at the same time give us three very good WRs that are all very different.

FIFY

It's interesting looking at the numbers. One thing that really eschews things is that with 4 of those teams, we are 25% of the data base against them while being 0% for the other. Take Total defense. All four of our opponents so far are at the very bottom. Is that because they played us?

That's a situation I remember and, even if she is somewhat correct, I can see the debate discussion becoming more about the moderator and not about the candidates.

Yes, yes he is. AND Cuban supported him until somewhat recently ... an interesting perspective for sure. I'd love to see those two go at it. He would eat him alive. And...so....this guy is mentally stable enough to be run our country????

Sooooo......he's basically admitting that having Mark Cuban in the front row is going to distract him and fluster him??? To my knowledge, the main thing Cuban has done is offer millions of dollars to Trump (or his charity of choice) to interview him. Is he really that scared to do that that the site of Cuban flusters him????

And....people want this family running the country........God help us all.

They're not hard to find. I must not know how to search for those types of things on twitter.

I personally believe the horrible tweets from fans should be made public with the name of the person who tweeted it.

This is a very touchy subject. My first and quick reaction is....hell yeah.....we need the moderators to fact check these bastards. Well.....then.....I start thinking about it. There isn't anybody moderating that is going to know every single fact a candidate might throw out there. So....what happens when the moderator corrects a fact from one candidate while not correcting a false fact from another simply because they didn't know it was false??? OR.....What happens when the moderator is actually wrong??? Agreed, but remember he's got that earpiece in, so somebody in the booth is in his ear with facts before he ever opens his mouth. Even if he didn't catch all, there will be flagrant misinformation shared, and zombies in the audience that will latch onto it and recite it tomorrow like it's fact. I'd like for some of that to at least be contested. Otherwise we risk the name calling and grandstanding as a distraction instead of an actual debate of issues. Hey...I would love for there to be fact checking right in the debate. But, all I'm saying is, there is a big chance of the political leanings of the moderator to come out then.....OR......the moderator to just be wrong. And....with these two, I would absolutely love it.

This is a very touchy subject. My first and quick reaction is....hell yeah.....we need the moderators to fact check these bastards. Well.....then.....I start thinking about it. There isn't anybody moderating that is going to know every single fact a candidate might throw out there. So....what happens when the moderator corrects a fact from one candidate while not correcting a false fact from another simply because they didn't know it was false??? OR.....What happens when the moderator is actually wrong???

They have put out some very good articles.