Do you have a link to this admission?
Clearly the reporter said something to him, you can tell by how quickly he turns his head. Something took his attention away from whatever he was pointing at. The fact that there is no audio is very convenient, how often do you think that a person working the video camera makes this mistake? I would venture to guess that this quy is attempting to cover up what he said to Carl.
Now, this in no way justifes the actions, its is a pretty safe asumtion that Carl did more than make a mad face and take a step twards the camera. What he did is not clear and it there is nothing showing that the camera was actually damaged. With that being said both the Pelinis need to control there temper better than they did this week.
As for the penalties being discused 16-2 is a pretty big differance. How can you not see that the refs had a direct effect on the game. Was it a hard fought game? Yes. Did A&M play hard all the way down to the wire? Also yes. However the refs absolutly changed the outcome of the game. I don't buy the whole "Big 12 out to get Nebraska" sutf, and we will never know if the refs did it on purpose, but to say they did not effect the outcome is being naive.
Also some of you need to really stop bashing the A&M fans, there team won a hard fought game, and they have been very respectful. We have a legit complaint about the refs but we cannot take it out on the A&M fans.
Sorry,
I fixed my post, didn't mean to say he admitted to grabbing the camera, I meant to say "if" he admitted. My bust