huskerfan333157

He said no young talent. Pretty sure Boyd and mixon would be considered young talent to anyone that watches NFL.

Mixon is bad? Boyd is bad? You can't be serious. Boyd was ranked the #12 NFL wr by pff. I'm assuming you dont watch nfl?

The pats finished 11 5 when matt friggen cassell was their qb. No other coach in history could go 11 5 with cassell (they missed the playoffs while going 11 5)

Michel has been pretty amazing for them too, he's had like 5 touchdowns in these playoffs.

That hurts.....

I hope the lions draft him in the 3rd or 4th round he would be a good spell for Johnson.

So you're saying that ypc is an irrelevant when comparing running backs? I sure hope you don't use that stat in future debates.

Alabama's record from 2000 til Saban got there: 3-8, 7-5, 4-9, 6-6, 10-2, 6-7. Man, you're right, they were such a powerhouse before Saban got there! He's also lost numerous coordinators but their ghosts must still be there since they're always doing the work. I mean, it's not a talent to keep finding coordinaters who are good to replace the other. I also forgot that Osborne was a saint, I mean it's not like he hid a gun for his player or wanted professors to change grades so football players would be eligible. Regardless, Saban is the best head coach of all time imo but Osborne is right after him.

Pick and pop is more common than pick and roll now.

I'm pretty sure "thou shall not talk about Harry potter and lord of the things on a football board" is a ten commandment

This would be amazing if he signs but I'm not getting my hopes up.

And Gebbia had a chance to beat Martinez? Seriously? So you're saying husker fans are mad at Gebbia because he transferred knowing he would never be the full time starter but everyone is okay with bunch transferring because he would never start....they are kind of similar

Because 75% of the board got mad that Gebbia transferred yet no one is getting mad about bunch. What's wrong with pointing out a double standard?

It also means a lot when you have players like tyreek hill come to Lincoln for a week to work with Williams. Williams is a great coach but had horrible coaching around him.

I always thought cav was a bad coach, shows you what I know (which is little)

I think we are another year away. I predicted 6 6 last year (even though i was being called an hater for it) and I'm predicting an 8 4 year this year. I think losing Morgan and ozigbo will hurt us more than people think. I also expect our defense to improve but we're still lacking in talent in that department. I fully expect us to win 10 or 11 games when Martinez is a senior and he should win the heisman.

You should change your name to ImAHomer.

I'm on my phone, I have no control over what my phone does! I also agree that you could make an argue for both, it seems like people on this board thinks there was a huge gap between the two. I'm still saying 1a and 1b.

Frazier missed a few games in 94 yet Nebraska still did pretty well. Not saying we are the same team but we would still win.

I'm not saying we would be the same team but I'm just saying it's ridiculous to think frazier was easily the more valuable player than George.

Nebraska without frazier would have still been a top 5 team. Osu without George would have had 3 more losses. George had better stats. I think the heisman should be about the most valuable player and I think you could argue George was that guy that year.

That's the problem, Nebraska could have their backups come in and still win. Nebraska without frazier would have still been a top 5 team, what would Ohio State have been without George? That's what the voters were looking at.

Frazier had the best play of the year but I don't understand all the hate for Eddie George winning it?

Yes but did you watch George play? They were both amazing that year.

I would be okay with Texas joining, they wouldn't be able to throw their weight around like they could in the big 12. Plus, we could start owning them.