gobiggergoredder

83 - Zach Broome Megamind

34 - Joshua Blue Droopy

47 - Landon Ard Tri Lambs

30 - Corey Addison Beetle Juice from Howard Stern

The Houston Police place a tent over restrained demonstrators (2:00 in the video), and at then gas those bound and trapped inside (3:12). Hey Gloria Allred, read your frickin quote. It never happened princess. It's as if you didn't even watch the video you posted. The only thing that you got right was that they put a tent over them. They weren't restrained, trapped or gassed. The worst part of it is there are likely others, suffering from extremely low IQ's as well (or too much medical marijuana), that believe that is what happened. In none of your ignorant babble have you backed up your claims, nor have you refuted any of mine. It is going to hard for me to wait until you back to the library in the morning (because the shelter doesn't have internet, your mom hasn't got it yet or there is too much foil on your windows to get good communication signals....I don't know what it is yet) to post your response. I award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul.

You addressed jack... don't blame me for your inadequicies.

Why place the tent over the bound demonstrators? I already addressed this, but apparently you are having a difficult time comprehending it (I will admit, this part is my opinion). At no point in the video do you ever see them bound by anything, so I'm not sure what you are referring to. The tent did not need gas from a cannister to give it structural integrity, why turn the gas on into the tent? After watching it a second time I noticed something else. I still believe that the 'air' was used for structure integrity. The interesting thing is that the video never shows him turning it on at 3:12 like you claim. Any idiot that can screw in a light bulb will realize that he is unscrewing whatever mechanism attaches to the tent. At 12:55 they release the air valves and the tent falls over. Sounds like it might need air for structural integrity. Add this this video/description to another of your misinformed/misleading rants.

The Houston Police place a tent over restrained demonstrators (2:00 in the video), and at then gas those bound and trapped inside (3:12). I have a hard time believing, based upon that video, that anyone was gassed. It looks to me as if they were using compressed air to provide integrity for the structure. Similar to a ‘Jumpy House’ you may see at a 6 year olds birthday party. The released the air at the end and it fell. Furthermore, there doesn’t appear to be anyone in the direct vicinity that is attempting to avoid these gasses (gasmask?). I also have a concern with your assumption that anyone was trapped in there. The walls appear to be multiple sections held together by Velcro. That being said, I don’t believe this was any type of containment structure. I am of the opinion, and I would like to get a law enforcement perspective, that this is nothing more than an attempt to minimize glorifying this type of protest. They don’t want to gas them and they don’t want any sensationalizing they arrest of those breaking the law. They bring in this structure, throw the cuffs on out of the view of cameras and hall them off. I would guess that the police are probably video and audio recording the arrests as a back up. They even took it a step further by having rescue squad members there. Again, this is my opinion, but I wholeheartedly disagree with your analysis of what happened in this video. This police force has decided not give those breaking the law the ’15 minutes’ they are looking for and I think it is pretty good idea as long as they are not mistreating those that they are arresting. Again, I would be surprised if the police force isn’t taping it. Police officers are now guilty until proven innocent in this era of cell phones and lazy journalism. Now they don’t have to put 6 officers on administrative leave for doing their job. I would like to get the perspective of the guy wearing the penguin suit at 3:50 before I go with anything though.

Did he leave the car there or did he carry it home?

Chuck Tack walked on and sat behind Josh Brown. Played a little bit in Canada.

I don't recall when the ban went into effect (I know it wasn't that long ago). Those that were against the ban said that this what would happen. It was just feel good legislation that didn't look at the big picture.

This is what I don't get.

I see all these advertisements about 'bank owned' and foreclosed housing lists. Can someone explain this to me? Are these really private lists that most people don't have access to? Are they really a hidden gem? Are these houses not listed on the MLS? It just seems like a scam. Thanks

I'm never right, so I'm running with this one. http:// http://www.huskerboard.com/index.php?/topic/53974-and-so-it-begins/

It's Bo right? I'm saying the new coach(s) will coach in the spring and he will announce the new hires sometime in May.

http://www.nakedcapi...s%E2%80%A6.html Carlfense....have any concerns with this article?

That couldn't happen here. Ahhh.....right?

I agree, let Bo coach the D. Bring in a solid D-Line Coach that know how to tip-toe the line and get recruits here.

No. In the area of the country that encompasses the Big 10, I'd rather sit in the dome in December. Houston had their C-USA game at home and that worked out pretty good.

Allegedly his first call was to Volleyball coach John Cook's wife.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7310399/ndamukong-suh-detroit-lions-unharmed-crashing-car-tree

Responding to a guy that had fallen from a bicycle because he appeared to be hurt. Doesn't sound like there was any violence associated with the 911 called. How the guy even ends up getting tased is beyond me.

I think you need to be careful saying good recruiter equals crook. Why do I have to careful? A lot of people throw around the notion, probably correct, that everyone in the SEC cheats, and others nod their heads. But I mention Zook, who btw gained much of his fame as a recruiter as an SEC coach, and you warn me? All I said that I was uneasy, and that sometimes it was for bad reasons. I'll trust that if Osborne hires him, Osborne thinks he's clean (or clean enough) and that's good enough for me. Someone on Rivals claiming that TO wants to hire him isn't proof for me. It's a lazy generalization.

I didn't follow them closely. I know their defense was poor, but they had a ton of sacks. How about some D-Line members.