STL Husker

Doesn't Creighton play their home games at TD? I'm sure the crouwds for a Big 10 tourney will have a better turnout than a CU game. Your other factors may come into play though.

Connie Yori? Just kidding, but for real...

I understand your frustration, but I don't exactly know what you want the coaching staff to do. They offered the big name recruits and missed on a few. I don't want to lose our integrity to get a great recruit. That's the one thing we have left. Every school misses on some guys. It happens. I actually like that they weren't afraid to go after the top recruits this year. It's not a video game where you can get anyone you want. What would you propose they do differently?

I think you may have the RB situation a little mixed up. It should be Rex/Ameer with the others on the rise. Ameer was definitely the top choice after Rex. For some reason people keep putting him farther down on the depth chart than he really was. I wonder if it has anything to do with him being the only 3 star out of the group.

This doesn't help me figure out what I'm supposed to wear. I'm not going to the game but am I still supposed to wear black, or do I wear my normal game day red, or should I have always been wearing white for the away games. I'm so confused! I need a black helmet.

I loved the chant...and the shoe part. They called us idiots back then when we were doing it.

I think we will win and I would put money on it, but weren't we saying the same thing about Iowa State last year. We were laughing at them for thinking they could beat us again after our 8? turnover game. I know they didn't end up beating us, but they were one well executed play away from doing it, and I think Washington has a better team. Let's not get too arrogant to believe that there isn't a chance we could lose.

Honestly, I think you can make any school fit into that criteria if you tried. It's also hard to tell if kids really think that an education is important, or if that's just something they they think they are supposed to say. For some reason I just don't think he is coming here. I hope I'm wrongDon't mean to be the downer, but I also don't think we need any one player either. The staff has shown they can do alot with average recruits on the dline.

It's kind of hard for this not to make me sound like a jerk, but I am pretty sure we aren't coaching our QBs to miss receivers. It's not just a matter of "Hey, maybe next time you should try completing that pass." Honestly, if I had to pick a position where we don't have a standout player, it would be at WR. All I want is for someone who catches a ball that hits their hands. They don't need to be extremely fast or strong, just reliable--like Swift or Peterson. I think we are oversimplifying the passing game by saying we just need to complete more passes to WR's and then we can start getting 4 and 5 star recruits. I would rather see us run the ball a majority of the time than to see us consistantly try to get balls to WRs. But maybe I am still scarred from a certain coaching regime.

Nice article on ESPN about him: http://espn.go.com/college-sports/recruiting/football/story/_/id/6796146/michael-rose-believes-nebraska He is a guy I am getting mroe excited about every day.

Just imagine his rating increases with that name! +5 speed, +10 arm strength, +8 accuraccy. And that's without having to pay for the extra training add on. I like it!

No, I completely agree. He should definitely change his name. He should even add 'Master' Derek Starling. Or maybe 'Esq.' Derek Starling. No, better yet drop Derek, and go with Esq. Edward Starling. Wait, they can track his last name to "backwater" Kansas. 'Esq. Edward Windsor'. Now people will take him seriously. But aren't baseball and football such barbaric sports. Give it up and play polo. Now there's a sophisticated game.