ferrisbva68 Posted September 9, 2006 Author Share Posted September 9, 2006 I am going to stick with more bad than good could have happened, and I am glad nothing did happen. Quote Link to comment
gamecocks Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 I am not really worried about how long he played. If Nicholls had been getting a great pass rush and was knocking him on his ass all day, then yes, he should of been pulled earlier. But he was never really in a position to get hurt. Quote Link to comment
ferrisbva68 Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 All you need is one rush, one strange play and there goes your season. To me it makes no difference if they were getting a good rush or not, it is just the fact that he was in there so long. People can disagree, and I am just glad nothing did happen to him. Quote Link to comment
gamecocks Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 All you need is one rush, one strange play and there goes your season. To me it makes no difference if they were getting a good rush or not, it is just the fact that he was in there so long. People can disagree, and I am just glad nothing did happen to him. That stuff could happen at any time. Heck, he could be standing on the sideline and someone could be hit into him and he tears his ACL. A person never knows when something like that is going to happen. When you start worrying about injuries, you stop thinking about the game. We still need Zac to get in a rythem with Herian, Purify and some others in a game atmosphere. Quote Link to comment
ferrisbva68 Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 As I said earlier, we can disagree, but I think we can agree that it was good that he didn't get injured and can now turn to preperation for USC. Quote Link to comment
Pedro Guerrero Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 It doesn't matter because NOTHING happened to him. If he got hurt then this talk would mean something, but he didn't so I could care less why he was in there. Quote Link to comment
RandyFloyd Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 I heard his great grandma was their and she had never seen him play so Callahan let him play into the third for her. Quote Link to comment
Redman Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Maybe Callahan was making sure he beat the 34 1/2 point spread. Quote Link to comment
Hawkeyehusker Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Maybe Callahan was making sure he beat the 34 1/2 point spread. Maybe that was part of it. Last week we dropped a position in the poll after we won by a huge margin. If we drop any more this week we could drop out of the polls all together if we lose next week. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 IMO, he should have come out for those last two series in the third quarter. Quote Link to comment
nepolo7 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Ganz Davis and Hildebrand should all have seen the field today Quote Link to comment
BigRedRick Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 I think BC left ZT in so long in order to gain rythem and rotate the backs and receivers. It was a scrimmage. It was practice for the O. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.