HuskerJosh82 Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 With some new coaching changes in the Big 12 North, do you think that the North will be as competative as the south in a couple of years? Quote Link to comment
hskrfan4life Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 i think in a couple of years it might become competitive BUT if we return to dominance it will be less competitive Quote Link to comment
huskerguy Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 I'm not sure... heres my take on the teams and coaches in the North... Nebraska- Making big strides every year of the BC era and seems to be the team to beat for awhile Kansas- A up and coming team with Mangino, will prolly never be a dominant team, but really improving to be a team that will make bowls most years Kansas St.- I think Prince will run that program all the way to the bottom. The way he recruits getting players based completly off telling them they will play will cost them to have pissed off players all the time, Kansas St. is such a hard place to get players to go, Snyder deserves a lot of credit he was a special coach for them, Prince isn't. Colorado- Let Hawkins get his players in and they could be a scary team in 2-3 years, but if we dont see improvements next year or the year after I think we can consider him a bust. Iowa St- Depends who they get to be their coach, I think they will also be sort of middle of the pack North. Mizzou- Probably the team with the brightest future in the North along with Nebraska. I dont think they will consistantly challenge for the North though. Quote Link to comment
huskernumerouno Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 I agree with each of those Quote Link to comment
darveaux Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Honestly...I don't think the South is all that strong this year Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Give the North a couple of years and it will most likely be the talk of the Big 12 IMO......... Quote Link to comment
ttheKid1*18 Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Give the North a couple of years and it will most likely be the talk of the Big 12 IMO......... The north should become strong over the next few years, with us and Mizzou neing on top imo Quote Link to comment
HuskerJosh82 Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 I'm not sure... heres my take on the teams and coaches in the North... Nebraska- Making big strides every year of the BC era and seems to be the team to beat for awhile Kansas- A up and coming team with Mangino, will prolly never be a dominant team, but really improving to be a team that will make bowls most years Kansas St.- I think Prince will run that program all the way to the bottom. The way he recruits getting players based completly off telling them they will play will cost them to have pissed off players all the time, Kansas St. is such a hard place to get players to go, Snyder deserves a lot of credit he was a special coach for them, Prince isn't. Colorado- Let Hawkins get his players in and they could be a scary team in 2-3 years, but if we dont see improvements next year or the year after I think we can consider him a bust. Iowa St- Depends who they get to be their coach, I think they will also be sort of middle of the pack North. Mizzou- Probably the team with the brightest future in the North along with Nebraska. I dont think they will consistantly challenge for the North though. I agree with you 100%, but I cant remember is Prince did anything at Virginia. Does anybody know? Quote Link to comment
strigori Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Prince had very average numbers at virginia. They finnished in the 40s to 60s every season in total offense while he was the OC. Which is why it was such a suprise hire. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.