Osborne Greatest of All Time

[COHUSKER]

Are you sure you're actually voting that way? I ran through the macro a couple of times and it's not actually "hitting" the button to vote for TO. I think it's just going to the page, then going down to the submit button below and hitting that.

 

In the last two hours TO has lost 1% of the vote and now is up only 40%-36%. He was at 41% when I last looked, with 500 or so votes for you in between. That seems odd to me.

 

Um, it hits the Tom Osborne button, if it didn't the Submit button wouldn't work. Try submitting without picking anyone, just goes to a blank page. And after my 500 votes it was still 41-36

 

If it doesn't select Tom for you, Edit the Macro and where it says TAG POS=# TYPE=INPUT:RADIO, put 4 in for the number if that's now what you have. I noticed some bugs in the recording.

 

I'm was just going to say that about the tag pos equalling 4. When I did it the first time I didn't notice but it put it as tag pos equaling 1 and I voted for Eddie Robinson like 1500 times. I got it fixed though and have now already voted for TO that many times and still going

[knapplc]

Yep - mine said position 1. I changed it to 4.

 

Here goes nothing...

[nejayhawk]

Well I'm going to let it run on my home PC all night looping with 99999 as the max, was going to remote into my work pc and into the computer science network at UNL but I don't want to get in trouble for using bandwidth improperly or something. (Granted I could always talk myself out of any trouble by saying it was for TO).

 

I will report my total number of TO votes tomorrow morning,

[knapplc]

Something clearly is not working. I think you guys are voting for Joe Paterno or something.

 

The percentages are now 40-37, so whatever you're doing isn't having the effect you want and I would suggest you stop using the macro.

[nejayhawk]

I didn't run it last night, my connection got dodgy and I couldn't run it without it timing out.

[papersun87]

Something clearly is not working. I think you guys are voting for Joe Paterno or something.

 

The percentages are now 40-37, so whatever you're doing isn't having the effect you want and I would suggest you stop using the macro.

*sigh* Guess it's back to voting manually. Oh, well, for TO anything's worth it.

[nejayhawk]

Somebody who followed my original instructions for the macro is still running it and voiting for eddie robinson. If this keeps up we're going to sabotage TO.

[socalhusker07]

Even if that one person, or more, continues voting for Eddie Robinson, why can't you all reset your macros and out-vote him? Also, do you have to delete your cookies after each vote or can you vote over and over and over and over without deleting them? Thanks everyone... keep it up!

[ferrisbva68]

This morning, it has it as a tie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[hskrmama]

Osborne is behind by 1% we have 5 days to pull him ahead. COME ON Huskers we can do this!!!

[Dan_F_30]

I think this thing is rigged by ESPN. The Nebraska fans voted their teams into the best of all time and they whined. Then ESPN screwed up the stats and his name and now all of a sudden a 6% or more lead has dwindled to none. It smells awfully fishy to me.....

[zE bOp]

Got my vote(s) in! I didn't see a misspell--must've corrected it.

 

So they didn't put Bud Wilkinson in the mix? How can they leave him out and have Lou Holtz in there?

[Bleeding Husker Red]

I think this thing is rigged by ESPN. The Nebraska fans voted their teams into the best of all time and they whined. Then ESPN screwed up the stats and his name and now all of a sudden a 6% or more lead has dwindled to none. It smells awfully fishy to me.....

 

 

At one time Tom lead like 57% to 33%.....

[HUSKER 37]

Wow..Bear's gaining on Tom.

 

(Dead heet)

[papersun87]

Tied at 39% each . . . I wonder what it will look like once JoePa and Eddie Robinson are eliminated, or if it will change anything?