HuskerInLostWages Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 I say we call it the Tyranosaurus Rex, at least for the next 3 years. T Rex for short. Quote Link to comment
sarge87 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 The "Jesus Christ please give us a damn touchdown" formation. The "Jesus Christ please give us a damn touchdown" formation. That's the third best so far. Nice work. Sorry, that's a disqualifier. You will be criticized by some here by using the "God card," and we wouldn't want to scare them away. Boogity Boogity. Quote Link to comment
newenglandhusker Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 It would be perfectly fine with me if the entire college football watching world just called it "The Wildcat" no matter who runs it or where. As others far more astute than I have pointed out, every f'ing school doesn't get a special name for when they line up in the shotgun, under center or virtually any other formation. This obsession with having a unique cutesy name for every team in the country that runs this old gimmick play is getting old. "Trickeration" old. Booyah. Quote Link to comment
wilber24 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 I was thinking the "Wild Cob" What else? WildRex Quote Link to comment
UGAHusker Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 "The Ernie Chambers". Doesn't get any crazier or "wild" than that. Quote Link to comment
WVhuskerXX Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 It would be perfectly fine with me if the entire college football watching world just called it "The Wildcat" no matter who runs it or where. As others far more astute than I have pointed out, every f'ing school doesn't get a special name for when they line up in the shotgun, under center or virtually any other formation. This obsession with having a unique cutesy name for every team in the country that runs this old gimmick play is getting old. "Trickeration" old. Quote Link to comment
wilber24 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 It would be perfectly fine with me if the entire college football watching world just called it "The Wildcat" no matter who runs it or where. As others far more astute than I have pointed out, every f'ing school doesn't get a special name for when they line up in the shotgun, under center or virtually any other formation. This obsession with having a unique cutesy name for every team in the country that runs this old gimmick play is getting old. "Trickeration" old. Wow!!! Quote Link to comment
tattooedhusker Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 It amazes me that, we find a WRINKLE that works and the people that were bitching about the offense are now bitching about this. It's not "our offense," it's a wrinkle nothing more. I don't give a sh#t what they call it, it works so the name don't mean dick. Quote Link to comment
Shaunk2007 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Rexually Transmitted Destruction Quote Link to comment
kansas husker Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Rexually Transmitted Destruction Winner Quote Link to comment
AllTheGoodNamesAreTaken Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 i'll admit that it worked for us, and has worked wonders for other teams, but i have an honest question. whats the difference between running the wildcat and any other offense if your QB can run? Quote Link to comment
sarge87 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Rexually Transmitted Destruction Winner I think you are about there, but this term sounds like I need Penicillin to get rid of it. Quote Link to comment
I See Red People Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 yes wildcat works. Quote Link to comment
newenglandhusker Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 i'll admit that it worked for us, and has worked wonders for other teams, but i have an honest question. whats the difference between running the wildcat and any other offense if your QB can run? There's a huge difference if your entire offense isn't predicated on using a running QB often. The distinction is in that, in a wildcat, you are using 2 very competent runners, as opposed to one very competent (RB) and one marginally competent (QB) runner. There aren't enough legitimate running threat QBs to go around and, even if there were, it wouldn't behoove every offense to turn to using them. In my opinion it is still substandard to a triple-option package, though. Quote Link to comment
redout22 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 There needs to be a poll on this. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.