Sub-Husker Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Blablabla... You lost. Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 It's not a contest, it's a conversation. You don't win the internet by failing to participate. Link to comment
carlfense Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Did this sort of thing impress people on Huskerpedia? (assuming that Sub was one of those refugees . . .) Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 It does seem to follow a pattern. Link to comment
carlfense Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 It does seem to follow a pattern. Step 1. Make a completely unsupported claim. Step 2. Get called out on that claim and fail to back it up. Step 3. ???? Step 4. Profit! Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Should probably add "attempt to distract from the fact that I cannot/will not support my claim by attempting to derail the conversation by focusing on one piece of irrelevant minutia, and when my conversation partner fails to take the bait, declare victory." Link to comment
carlfense Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 And maybe try to hide a lack of a coherent argument by saying that other people just aren't smart enough to understand the brilliance of the poster. Link to comment
Sub-Husker Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 It's not a contest, it's a conversation. You don't win the internet by failing to participate. You have failed to read, and failed to respond to direct questions. You lost, but at leat you have a parrot. Link to comment
Sub-Husker Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Step 1. Make a completely unsupported claim. Look at posts #88 and #100: Step 2. Get called out on that claim and fail to back it up. If you missed posts #88 and #100, look at post #145: Step 3. ???? Definitely one of Carl’s more coherent posts. Step 4. Profit! Definitely not one of Carl’s more coherent posts. Link to comment
Sub-Husker Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 And maybe try to hide a lack of a coherent argument by saying that other people just aren't smart enough to understand the brilliance of the poster. In your case it is true. Link to comment
carlfense Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 And maybe try to hide a lack of a coherent argument by saying that other people just aren't smart enough to understand the brilliance of the poster. In your case it is true. ! Link to comment
Sub-Husker Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Should probably add "attempt to distract from the fact that I cannot/will not support my claim by attempting to derail the conversation by focusing on one piece of irrelevant minutia, and when my conversation partner fails to take the bait, declare victory." If you refuse to acknowledge basic information provided to you on the initial point of a discussion topic, then refuse to provide any info as to why it is not valid, there is no reason to attampt to take the discussion any further (as I had said before). Link to comment
carlfense Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 Victory has been declared. Several times. Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 All we're missing is an aircraft carrier and a big "Mission Accomplished" banner. Everyone is responsible for providing their own flight suit. Link to comment
carlfense Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 All we're missing is an aircraft carrier and a big "Mission Accomplished" banner. Everyone is responsible for providing their own flight suit. A submarine with a Mission Accomplished banner would be more appropriate. A super secret and very important submarine. Link to comment
Recommended Posts