Jump to content


Us Ambassador to Libya killed by Militants


Recommended Posts

I'm just wondering how pissy the middle easterners would have been, if one of these protesters would have come storming through that gate saw a Marine showing him the business end of a M-4, then popped him a new a$$hole in the forehead...

Forehead a$$holes do tend to dampen enthusiasm . . .

 

Yes, while this is true, just imagine the sh#tstorm that would have followed...

"Warmongering Marine Kills Innocent Demonstrator Inciting Violence From Otherwise Peaceful Assembly."

 

+1

 

Couldn't have been put better...

Link to comment

Couldn't have been put better...

I think I'd probably make one change . . .

"Warmongering Marine Kills Murders Inhumanely Slaughters Innocent Demonstrator Inciting Violence From Otherwise Peaceful Assembly."

 

there we go

Better!

 

In a weird way, I'm glad that Marines weren't subjected to that...

Link to comment

Just taking a stab at resurrecting a timeline since most of the ahem…….independent press………..seem content to let it evaporate

 

* We get warnings ahead of time about possible attacks (and ignore them and do not beef up security)

* 9/11 arrives and the attacks commence

* Ambassador (who had previously worried about his safety) attempts to flee but is caught, tortured and killed enroute to his supposedly secret new location.

* BO ignores the gravity of an act of war and American deaths and goes to Vegas for fundraising event

* Administrative response team (worried about foreign policy cred after inflaming Muslims with repeated victory dances about the death of Osama) goes into full denial

* BO, Hillary and sacrificial Susan Rice are adamant that sole cause is a little known video (that has been public for months already) and double down on consecutive days

* Libyan President vociferously contradicts them publicly

* Media spends ten times the amount of time on Romney’s response compared to Obama’s self-preservation coverup

* CNN finds the ambassador’s diary and some sensitive documents (what the hell?)

* Administration microscopically changes the narrative in the face of overwhelming proof

* BO goes on the "View" to handle tough questions from noted patriot Joy Behar

* BO declares we are still investigating

* BO declares we can’t jump to conclusions because FBI is investigating

* (“investigating” widely read to mean stalling…hopefully until after Nov 6)

* BO goes to the UN and blames the video

* We find out two weeks into the supposed investigation the FBI STILL not on the ground

* Sept 28 an Administration spokesperson insists 9/11 date had nothing to do with the attacks

* Entire philosophy of the Obama Doctrine in the Middle East falls apart

* Story still unfolding but don’t look for Woodward/Bernstein type of coverage from the democratic spokesmen masquerading as professional journalists at ABC/NBC/CBS

Link to comment

That's a lot of tinfoil there.

 

What, exactly, are you trying to get at with this? What is "BO" doing wrong here?

 

This first bullet point "We get warnings ahead of time about possible attacks (and ignore them and do not beef up security)" - is this some implication that America just blithely let one of their Ambassadors get murdered? You do realize we get literally hundreds, sometimes thousands, of "warnings" per day, right? If we beefed up security after every single warning we'd have tens of thousands more troops across the globe than we do now.

 

I presume the Derpians from Fox News (et al) are spinning this into something terribly nefarious by BO. Care to explain what that is?

 

What do you think this investigation will turn up? What do you think we should do if it turns out our Ambassador was actually murdered as described?

Link to comment

That's a lot of tinfoil there.

 

What, exactly, are you trying to get at with this? What is "BO" doing wrong here? So, you're OK with going to campaign events and the "View" and stiffing foreign leaders during this crisis? At some point, leaders lead, not just campaign 24/7. Or, even govern. What has he done wrong here? How about lying?

 

This first bullet point "We get warnings ahead of time about possible attacks (and ignore them and do not beef up security)" - is this some implication that America just blithely let one of their Ambassadors get murdered? You do realize we get literally hundreds, sometimes thousands, of "warnings" per day, right? If we beefed up security after every single warning we'd have tens of thousands more troops across the globe than we do now. You find no culpability in the State Dept NOT recognizing 9/11 as a celebration day for those vying to eliminate us? Any warning on THAT date doesn't carry any extra weight? Wow.

 

I presume the Derpians from Fox News (et al) are spinning this into something terribly nefarious by BO. Care to explain what that is? Please. Every time anything is posted that doesn't promulgate the media lovefest with the President it is automatically chalked up to Fox and/or derp. As you have cautioned others correctly on occasion.............be better than that.

 

What do you think this investigation will turn up? What do you think we should do if it turns out our Ambassador was actually murdered as described? No idea what it will turn up, but when stalling tactics are used by claiming....."it's an ongoing investigation" and the FBI is investigating, and then we learn after 2 weeks, they have not even been deployed to the site yet.............it sends up red flags and it should bother ANYONE who is looking for answers as to how Americans were murdered.

Link to comment

So typical for you. If you can't explain the facts...............Mock...........

It was a joke . . .

 

In general, facts don't need to be explained. Opinions do.

 

Points # 1-4 Facts; 5 opinion; 6-13 Facts; 14 opinion; 15-17 Facts; 18, 19 Opinion.

 

* We get warnings ahead of time about possible attacks (and ignore them and do not beef up security)

* 9/11 arrives and the attacks commence

* Ambassador (who had previously worried about his safety) attempts to flee but is caught, tortured and killed enroute to his supposedly secret new location.

* BO ignores the gravity of an act of war and American deaths and goes to Vegas for fundraising event

* Administrative response team (worried about foreign policy cred after inflaming Muslims with repeated victory dances about the death of Osama) goes into full denial

* BO, Hillary and sacrificial Susan Rice are adamant that sole cause is a little known video (that has been public for months already) and double down on consecutive days

* Libyan President vociferously contradicts them publicly

* Media spends ten times the amount of time on Romney’s response compared to Obama’s self-preservation coverup

* CNN finds the ambassador’s diary and some sensitive documents (what the hell?)

* Administration microscopically changes the narrative in the face of overwhelming proof

* BO goes on the "View" to handle tough questions from noted patriot Joy Behar

* BO declares we are still investigating

* BO declares we can’t jump to conclusions because FBI is investigating

* (“investigating” widely read to mean stalling…hopefully until after Nov 6)

* BO goes to the UN and blames the video

* We find out two weeks into the supposed investigation the FBI STILL not on the ground

* Sept 28 an Administration spokesperson insists 9/11 date had nothing to do with the attacks

* Entire philosophy of the Obama Doctrine in the Middle East falls apart

* Story still unfolding but don’t look for Woodward/Bernstein type of coverage from the democratic spokesmen masquerading as professional journalists at ABC/NBC/CBS

Link to comment

So typical for you. If you can't explain the facts...............Mock...........

It was a joke . . .

 

In general, facts don't need to be explained. Opinions do.

 

Points # 1-4 Facts; 5 opinion; 6-13 Facts; 14 opinion; 15-17 Facts; 18, 19 Opinion.

 

* We get warnings ahead of time about possible attacks (and ignore them and do not beef up security)

* 9/11 arrives and the attacks commence

* Ambassador (who had previously worried about his safety) attempts to flee but is caught, tortured and killed enroute to his supposedly secret new location.

* BO ignores the gravity of an act of war and American deaths and goes to Vegas for fundraising event

* Administrative response team (worried about foreign policy cred after inflaming Muslims with repeated victory dances about the death of Osama) goes into full denial

* BO, Hillary and sacrificial Susan Rice are adamant that sole cause is a little known video (that has been public for months already) and double down on consecutive days

* Libyan President vociferously contradicts them publicly

* Media spends ten times the amount of time on Romney’s response compared to Obama’s self-preservation coverup

* CNN finds the ambassador’s diary and some sensitive documents (what the hell?)

* Administration microscopically changes the narrative in the face of overwhelming proof

* BO goes on the "View" to handle tough questions from noted patriot Joy Behar

* BO declares we are still investigating

* BO declares we can’t jump to conclusions because FBI is investigating

* (“investigating” widely read to mean stalling…hopefully until after Nov 6)

* BO goes to the UN and blames the video

* We find out two weeks into the supposed investigation the FBI STILL not on the ground

* Sept 28 an Administration spokesperson insists 9/11 date had nothing to do with the attacks

* Entire philosophy of the Obama Doctrine in the Middle East falls apart

* Story still unfolding but don’t look for Woodward/Bernstein type of coverage from the democratic spokesmen masquerading as professional journalists at ABC/NBC/CBS

Not really . . . you're still confusing facts and opinions.

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...