TonyStalloni Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/schools/finances/?siteID=je6NUbpObpQ-XQunU51_93C_.0gVE40Iwg I'm assuming this is athletic dept revenue. I'm surprised by a few of the Big Ten schools. Wisconsin at #2, Iowa at #11 and Minnesota at #15. Also Louisville at #18 and Illinois and Rutgers were higher than I would have guessed. Nebraska comes in at #26. A bit lower than I thought. I would have said we'd be in the top 20. Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 We still don't get much full share from the conference which really hurts. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 Only 7 schools are not subsidized. I still fail to see where the athletes make the schools so much money. Looks to me that with all but 7 schools, the athletes cost the schools money. Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 Only 7 schools are not subsidized. I still fail to see where the athletes make the schools so much money. Looks to me that with all but 7 schools, the athletes cost the schools money. Texas, Ohio St, Oklahoma, LSU, Penn St, Nebraska, Purdue - four of seven from Big Ten Annnnnnd . . . "One of these schools are not like the others, one of these schools doesn't belong . . . ." Quote Link to comment
Abdullah the Butcher Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 Purdue reformed their tuition and spending, acting financially smart. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.