Hingle McCringleberry Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 We are positive in the same way you were 100% sure that Bo was never going to win anything at nebraska Hedley. For the last two years the Bo haters have been on here bashing every loss, coach and playcall. Now it's our turn to question everything your coach does. Sounds like he is already off to a good start with the hiring of Banker and Read. It's not a good sign when the Oregon state play by play guy says they suck. I hope your post is meant to be sarcastic. It perfectly illustrates the "us versus them" attitutude that defined the Bo Pelini era and created the toxicity around the program that led to everyones' misery and Pelini's dismissal. Pelini wasn't fired for only winning 9 games, he was fired for fostering this divide in the program. If Pelini had spent more time managing the team and less time worrying that officials, administrators, media, conference officials and bad fans were out to get him, he probably would have had more success on the field and would likely still be the coach he was fired because Perlman didn't "like" him plain and simple- if TO were still AD does anyone think Pellini would have been fired? take all your emotions about Pellini out of it, the answer is very pellucid- and it is no The main reason he was fired was because Tom finally saw the light after the Wisconsin game and said that Bo had to go. Just because he isn't the AD, doesn't mean that he doesn't have pull when it comes to these things. A lot of the big $$$$ boosters still listen to him and if he wasn't on board, then you would have heard more grumbling from them than you do. No. No, no, no, no & no.. Say what you want but Tom is out, and that is as it should be. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.