GetReal Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 Illinois 48 - Purdue 14. Perhaps Illinois should seize the name "blackshirts" - it sure as heck does not fit Nebraska. Quote Link to comment
Street Novelist Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 Don't worry; I'm sure people here will figure out a way to pin our loss to Purdue on poor player performance and not poor coaching. Quote Link to comment
brophog Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 Purdue's run defense was and probably still is last in the conference in rush defense. Mind-boggling (but not surprising) that our game plan wasn't adjusted to reflect that. I guess that's what we said for a week now, It appears Illinois knew this going in, watched the film, exploited it and will win easily. Is the lack of a running game for Nebraska a matter of "can't" or "won't" Wrong logical conjuction. Quote Link to comment
huskerfan92 Posted November 7, 2015 Author Share Posted November 7, 2015 Stat Comparison of Nebraska & Illinois vs Purdue: Rushing Offense (Attempts-Yards): Nebraska 29 - 77yds Illinois 41 - 382yds Passing Offense (Total Passing Yards, Completions-Attempts): Nebraska 407, 29-48 Illinois 213, 21-38 Turnovers: Nebraska 5 (1 lost fumble, 4 INT) Illinois 0 Rushing Defense (Total Rushing Yards Allowed): Nebraska 183yds (4.9 yds per rush) Illinois 89 yds (3.2 yds per rush) Passing Defense (Total Passing Yards Allowed): Nebraska 274yds (6.4 yds per pass) Illinois 174ds (4.3 yds per pass) Defense Total Yards Allowed: Nebraska 457yds Illinois 263 yds For the rushing offense. You take away Fyfe's sacks and the WR runs and you have our running backs gaining 97 yards on 20 carries....basically a first down every two carries Quote Link to comment
Kiyoat Husker Posted November 8, 2015 Share Posted November 8, 2015 While I agree that our game plan and play calling was piss-poor and we would have probably lost that game anyway, Don't fixate on the 55 points as being all on the defense. When you turn it over FIVE TIMES resulting in 28 points, what would have been a close loss morphs into a beat down. Fife was going to make some mistakes in his first start. We should have run more. Quote Link to comment
NUinID Posted November 9, 2015 Share Posted November 9, 2015 It really is a matter of wanting to run the ball. Nebraska against MSU really wanted to run the ball. It probably actually helped that Newby was hurt as far as the running game goes. They realized that Cross runs the power game better than zone read stuff. So that is what they ran and it worked. The power stuff would have worked against Purdue that is just not what they want to do. Maybe they will get a clue and realize they can run the power stuff. I sure hope so. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.