DevoHusker

Eichner's tweet was tongue in cheek. The original tweet and responses were/are not. I call out stupid conspiracy crap when I see it, regardless of genesis. But you may be right on one thing. Perhaps I dont get all the nuances of liberal humor, I am new to it remember.

No, the joke is you, and @knapplcshould have responded with "a fake Melania...how stupid are people?" Just like you do with questionable truths from the right. But, because this dumb sh*t comes from the left you respond with "hey, you never know...this substitute first lady stuff could be true/she actually kissed him and held his hand" Its hilarious.

100%

Hopefully, about 70%, for Biden. It must be concisive.

I agree...to a point. Biden is better than the current option, but with 320 million people to choose from, I cannot fathom that we have to choose from these two.

Dead bang giveaway

Glad to hear that you and Billy are close buds...since you know it was a "joke tweet". He retweeted a tweet about a body double Flotus that has 14k likes and several thousand comments...but whatever floats your boat.

I will vote Tuesday against Trump. My ballot will be for Biden. No celebration dance afterwards, but there is really no other viable choice to make.

It's not just the right that go in for conspiracy theories

It is truly lucky that it is not nearly as contagious as H1N1. Can't even fathom the repercussions of over 60 million cases...

Disagree on foundation. You have absolutely no idea if they are bad people, other than their vote or support of a political candidate who you have deemed to be distasteful or inferior to your values. Hopefully after Tuesday we won't have to worry about it any more.

What is a non-neutral angle? I explained my stance in a response to @Moiraine.

My point is that @knapplc is calling Nicklaus a bad person because he is voting for Trump. knapp, you and I may not agree with his personal decision on his candidate. That is our right. But he can support whoever he wants. To talk bad about the candidate he chose is fine and dandy by me, and I agree. But to denigrate the man making the choice, due only to his choice, is not okay. There will be between 150 million and 240 million people that vote for President by next Tuesday. Trump will likely receive somewhere between 30%-50% of those votes. Those 45 to 120 million people are not evil bad people, even if their candidate is.

A lifetime of charitable work. Literally. If he wasn't supporting Trump, you would give him accolades. Pretend it was HRC that got elected in 2016. Same headline and tweet. You probably would have re-posted it yourself as a shining beacon how celebrities can do good works. Because he votes for the candidate you despise, does not change the good that he has done.

Yeah, terrible guy that Jack. Getting funding for a mobile trauma unit to help low income kids in Florida after natural disasters. Shame on him. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/11/trump-jack-nicklaus-1259949

A lot of comments, from both sides of the aisle

IKR? Why the discrepancy

Man! Got into The Boys this weekend when the snow was flying. What a great series. Dark humor and superheroes. Have binged up to Season 2 already.

Common sense and Kevin Warren in the same sentence...what?

2-0 Husker winner rush-0 pass-0