They aren't Sudanese, but maybe they're not from Syria. They are middle Eastern in appearance, not African. Not sure if not Syrian, but that's what we've heard.
Regardless, they are virtually all single men living together.
Locally, there are hundreds of single Somalian and Syrian men. One apartment complex in GI is nothing but Muslim men. A couple of parks in town had to put up cctv to monitor the drinking/drugs/fights.
Anecdotal I know.
I, as always, am speaking of illegal immigrants. You are talking about legal newcomers. I am very pro legal immigration btw, as stated here many many times.
Big difference.
I am having a difficult time finding hard numbers. Of course it is secretive, because of the civil liberties violation aspect, but I am seeing everything from 200k a year to an astonishing 3.4 million warrants a year of US citizens' data...all without a warrant.
I think that, as currently utilized, FISA was bad because it allowed for US citizens to be surveilled without a warrant. Foreign nationals/citizens on foreign soil suspects of crimes should be treated differently than US citizens on our own soil.
I am not sure if that is what the no vote was trying to fix? I kind of think that's the case since every single D voted no.
I think that, in it's current state, the R party is completely dysfunctional. I was wondering what point the op was trying to make? Was voting with all the Ds bad? Was the no vote itself bad? Is 702 bad?